Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32132097›Full record

ArticleGenetics2020

Fast Algorithms for Conducting Large-Scale GWAS of Age-at-Onset Traits Using Cox Mixed-Effects Models.

Liang He, Alexander M Kulminski

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. SPANature communications · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Time-varying effects are common in genetic control of gestational duration.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Liang HeBiodemography of Aging Research Unit, Social Science Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina lh235@duke.edu alexander.kulminski@duke.edu.
Alexander M KulminskiBiodemography of Aging Research Unit, Social Science Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina lh235@duke.edu alexander.kulminski@duke.edu.
Duke University · USSocial Science Research Council · US

Funding

Relationships among Genetic Regulators of Aging Health and LifespanP01AG043352 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI YASHIN, ANATOLIY I · 2014 to 2018
$8.7M
ApoE2 and protective molecular signatures in Alzheimer's disease and agingR01AG061853 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI KULMINSKI, ALEXANDER M · 2018 to 2022
$3.9M
Personalized genetic profiles of risk and resilience in Alzheimer's and vascular diseasesR01AG065477 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI KULMINSKI, ALEXANDER M · 2020 to 2024
$3.8M
Molecular signatures of health and life span disparities between whites and African-Americans in the APOE regionR01AG047310 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI KULMINSKI, ALEXANDER M · 2015 to 2019
$2.5M
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG043352NIA NIH HHS R01 AG047310NIA NIH HHS R01 AG061853NIA NIH HHS R01 AG065477
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Age-at-onset is one of the critical traits in cohort studies of age-related diseases. Large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of age-at-onset traits can provide more insights into genetic effects on disease progression and transitions between stages. Moreover, proportional hazards (or Cox) regression models can achieve higher statistical power in a cohort study than a case-control trait using logistic regression. Although mixed-effects models are widely used in GWAS to correct for sample dependence, application of Cox mixed-effects models (CMEMs) to large-scale GWAS is so far hindered by intractable computational cost. In this work, we propose COXMEG, an efficient R package for conducting GWAS of age-at-onset traits using CMEMs. COXMEG introduces fast estimation algorithms for general sparse relatedness matrices including, but not limited to, block-diagonal pedigree-based matrices. COXMEG also introduces a fast and powerful score test for dense relatedness matrices, accounting for both population stratification and family structure. In addition, COXMEG generalizes existing algorithms to support positive semidefinite relatedness matrices, which are common in twin and family studies. Our simulation studies suggest that COXMEG, depending on the structure of the relatedness matrix, is orders of magnitude computationally more efficient than coxme and coxph with frailty for GWAS. We found that using sparse approximation of relatedness matrices yielded highly comparable results in controlling false-positive rate and retaining statistical power for an ethnically homogeneous family-based sample. By applying COXMEG to a study of Alzheimer's disease (AD) with a Late-Onset Alzheimer's Disease Family Study from the National Institute on Aging sample comprising 3456 non-Hispanic whites and 287 African Americans, we identified the

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseAge of OnsetAlzheimer DiseaseApolipoproteins EGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansPedigreePolymorphism, Single NucleotideApolipoproteins Eage-at-onsetAlzheimer’s diseaseCox mixed-effects modelGWAStime-to-event analysis

Identifiers

PMID32132097
PMCPMC7198273
OpenAlexW3009672485

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.