Evidence mapPaperPMID 32147709Full record

Trial reportThe journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences2020

The Tribulations of Trials: Lessons Learnt Recruiting 777 Older Adults Into REtirement in ACTion (REACT), a Trial of a Community, Group-Based Active Aging Intervention Targeting Mobility Disability.

Janet Withall, Colin J Greaves, Janice L Thompson, Jolanthe L de Koning, Jessica C Bollen, Sarah J Moorlock, Kenneth R Fox, Max J Western, Tristan Snowsill, Antonieta Medina-Lara and 10 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Clarifying healthy aging: building a common language for policy innovation within the Age-It Research Program.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Janet WithallDepartment for Health, University of Bath, UK.
Colin J GreavesSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK.
Janice L ThompsonSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK.
Jolanthe L de KoningDepartment for Health, University of Bath, UK.
Jessica C BollenUniversity of Exeter Medical School, St Luke's Campus, UK.
Sarah J MoorlockSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK.
Kenneth R FoxCentre for Exercise, Nutrition and Health Sciences, School for Policy Studies, University of Bristol, UK.
Max J WesternDepartment for Health, University of Bath, UK.
Tristan SnowsillInstitute of Health Research, College of Medicine and Health, South Cloisters, University of Exeter, St Luke's Campus, UK.
Antonieta Medina-LaraUniversity of Exeter Medical School, St Luke's Campus, UK.
Rosina CrossDepartment for Health, University of Bath, UK.
Peter LadlowAcademic Department of Military Rehabilitation (ADMR), Defence Medical Rehabilitation Centre (DMRC) Stanford Hall, Loughborough, UK.
Gordon TaylorUniversity of Exeter Medical School, St Luke's Campus, UK.
Vasiliki ZisiDepartment of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Thessaly, Trikala, Greece.
James ClynesDepartment for Health, University of Bath, UK.
Selena GrayFaculty of Health and Applied Sciences (HAS), University of the West of England (UWE Bristol), Frenchay Campus, Bristol, UK.
Sandra Agyapong-BaduSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK.
Jack M GuralnikDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland, School of Medicine, Baltimore.
W Jack RejeskiDepartment of Health and Exercise Science, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
Afroditi StathiSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK.

Funding

Department of Health 13/164/51Medical Research Council MR/P021220/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChallenges of recruitment to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and successful strategies to overcome them should be clearly reported to improve recruitment into future trials. REtirement in ACTion (REACT) is a United Kingdom-based multicenter RCT recruiting older adults at high risk of mobility disability to a 12-month group-based exercise and behavior maintenance program or to a minimal Healthy Aging control intervention.

methodsThe recruitment target was 768 adults, aged 65 years and older scoring 4-9 on the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). Recruitment methods include the following: (a) invitations mailed by general practitioners (GPs); (b) invitations distributed via third-sector organizations; and (c) public relations (PR) campaign. Yields, efficiency, and costs were calculated.

resultsThe study recruited 777 (33.9% men) community-dwelling, older adults (mean age 77.55 years (SD 6.79), mean SPPB score 7.37 (SD 1.56)), 95.11% white (n = 739) and broadly representative of UK quintiles of deprivation. Over a 20-month recruitment period, 25,559 invitations were issued. Eighty-eight percent of the participants were recruited via GP invitations, 5.4% via the PR campaign, 3% via word-of-mouth, and 2.5% via third-sector organizations. Mean recruitment cost per participant was £78.47, with an extra £26.54 per recruit paid to GPs to cover research costs.

conclusionsREACT successfully recruited to target. Response rates were lower than initially predicted and recruitment timescales required adjustment. Written invitations from GPs were the most efficient method for recruiting older adults at risk of mobility disability. Targeted efforts could achieve more ethnically diverse cohorts. All trials should be required to provide recruitment data to enable evidence-based planning of future trials.

Indexed as

Healthy AgingMobility LimitationPatient SelectionAgedFemaleHumansIndependent LivingMalePersons with DisabilitiesRetirementUnited KingdomPhysical activityPhysical functionRandomized control trial

Identifiers

PMID32147709
PMCPMC7662171

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.