ArticlePlant physiology2020
Rapid Chlorophyll
Article in Plant physiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Functional Trait Variation and Reverse Phenology in the Tropical Dry Forest SpeciesPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Combine photosynthetic characteristics and leaf hyperspectral reflectance for early detection of water stress.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Evaluating photosynthetic models and their potency in assessing plant responses to changing oxygen concentrations: a comparative analysis ofFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Using chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and antioxidant enzyme activity to assess drought tolerance of spring wheat.Photosynthetica · 2024Article
- Stress phenotyping analysis leveraging autofluorescence image sequences with machine learning.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Rapid Light-Response Curve of Chlorophyll Fluorescence in Terrestrial Plants: Relationship to COPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Crop improvement is crucial to ensuring global food security under climate change, and hence there is a pressing need for phenotypic observations that are both high throughput and improve mechanistic understanding of plant responses to environmental cues and limitations. In this study, chlorophyll
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.