Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32154030›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental epigenetics2020

Non-CpG methylation biases bisulphite PCR towards low or unmethylated mitochondrial DNA: recommendations for the field.

Margaret J Morris, Luke B Hesson, Neil A Youngson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental epigenetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Changes in Mitochondrial Epigenome in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.British journal of biomedical science · 2023
    Review
  3. Epigenetics and Pregnancy: Conditional Snapshot or Rolling Event.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Mitochondrial Epigenetics and Environmental Health: Making a Case for Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Margaret J MorrisSchool of Medical Sciences, UNSW Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
Luke B HessonPrince of Wales Clinical School and Lowy Cancer Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
Neil A YoungsonSchool of Medical Sciences, UNSW Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0690-4580
UNSW Sydney · AUKing's College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is a circular genome of 16 kb that is present in multiple copies in mitochondria. mtDNA codes for genes that contribute to mitochondrial structure and function. A long-standing question has asked whether mtDNA is epigenetically regulated similarly to the nuclear genome. Recently published data suggest that unlike the nuclear genome where CpG methylation is the norm, mtDNA is methylated predominantly at non-CpG cytosines. This raises important methodological considerations for future investigations. In particular, existing bisulphite PCR techniques may be unsuitable due to primers being biased towards amplification from unmethylated mtDNA. Here, we describe how this may have led to previous studies underestimating the level of mtDNA methylation and reiterate methodological strategies for its accurate assessment.

Indexed as

bisulphite sequencingmitochondrial DNAmtDNA methylationnon-CpG methylationPCR bias

Identifiers

PMID32154030
PMCPMC7055202
OpenAlexW3010347607

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.