Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32157202›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Urology2020

Application of miRNAs in the diagnosis and monitoring of testicular germ cell tumours.

Kristian Almstrup, João Lobo, Nina Mørup, Gazanfer Belge, Ewa Rajpert-De Meyts, Leendert H J Looijenga, Klaus-Peter Dieckmann

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
15.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Kristian Almstrup *Department of Growth and Reproduction, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. kristian.almstrup@regionh.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1832-0307
João Lobo *Cancer Biology and Epigenetics Group, IPO Porto Research Center (GEBC CI-IPOP), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto) & Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center (P.CCC), R. Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida, Porto, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6829-1391
Nina MørupDepartment of Growth and Reproduction, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7332-4116
Gazanfer BelgeUniversity Bremen, Faculty of Biology & Chemistry, Bremen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8613-3450
Ewa Rajpert-De MeytsDepartment of Growth and Reproduction, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5946-7559
Leendert H J LooijengaPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, Netherlands. l.looijenga@prinsesmaximacentrum.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8146-1911
Klaus-Peter DieckmannDepartment of Urology, Hodentumorzentrum Hamburg, Asklepios Klinik Altona, Hamburg, Germany. dieckmannkp@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3821-7956
University of Copenhagen · DKAsklepios Klinik Altona · DECopenhagen University Hospital · DKInstituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil · PTPrincess Máxima Center · NLUniversity of Bremen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Testicular germ cell tumours (TGCTs) are the most frequent cancer type in young men and originate from the common precursor germ cell neoplasia in situ (GCNIS). For decades, clinical management of patients with TGCT has relied on classic serum tumour markers: α-fetoprotein, human chorionic gonadotropin subunit-β and lactate dehydrogenase. In the past 10 years, microRNAs have been shown to outperform classic serum tumour markers in the diagnosis of primary tumours and in follow-up monitoring and prediction of relapse. miR-371a-3p is the most consistent marker and exhibits >90% diagnostic sensitivity and specificity in TGCT. However, miR-371a-3p cannot be used to diagnose GCNIS or mature teratoma. Future efforts must technically standardize the microRNA-based methods internationally and introduce miR-371a-3p as a molecular liquid biopsy-based marker for TGCTs in the clinic.

Indexed as

Aftercarealpha-FetoproteinsBiomarkers, TumorChorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, HumanHumansLiquid BiopsyL-Lactate DehydrogenaseMaleMicroRNAsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasms, Germ Cell and EmbryonalSeminomaSensitivity and SpecificityTeratomaTesticular Neoplasmsalpha-FetoproteinsBiomarkers, TumorChorionic Gonadotropin, beta Subunit, HumanL-Lactate DehydrogenaseMicroRNAsMIRN302A microRNA, humanMIRN367 microRNA, humanMIRN371 microRNA, humanMIRN372 microRNA, humanMIRN373 microRNA, human

Identifiers

PMID32157202
OpenAlexW3011261117

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.