Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32160873›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2020

Validation of the Finnish Health Improvement Profile (HIP) with patients with severe mental illness.

Camilla Werkkala, Maritta Välimäki, Minna Anttila, Virve Pekurinen, Daniel Bressington

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06996899 (Establishing Utility of a Physical Health Improvement Intervention in a Regional Mental Health Impatient Service), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06996899 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Establishing Utility of a Physical Health Improvement Intervention in a Regional Mental Health Impatient Service: a Multimethod Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorCharles Darwin UniversityRan2026 to 2028Enrolled25ConditionsPhysical Health, Mental Illnesses, Chronic DiseasesArmsHealth Improvement Profile (HIP), Clinician Health Improvement Profile user training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Camilla WerkkalaDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Joukahaisenkatu 3-5, 20014, Turku, Finland. camaka@utu.fi.
Maritta VälimäkiDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Joukahaisenkatu 3-5, 20014, Turku, Finland.
Minna AnttilaDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Joukahaisenkatu 3-5, 20014, Turku, Finland.
Virve PekurinenDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Joukahaisenkatu 3-5, 20014, Turku, Finland.
Daniel BressingtonThe Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong.
University of Turku · FIHong Kong Polytechnic University · HK

Funding

Maritta Välimäki 26003424
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhysical health among people with severe mental illness (SMI) is a global concern. However, many people with SMI do not receive regular comprehensive health checks. There is currently no validated physical health check instrument systematically used in Finnish mental health services. Therefore, this study aims to validate and establish the potential clinical utility of the translated Health Improvement Profile (HIP) tool for Finnish patients with SMI and compare differences in physical health risk items across genders.

methodsThe content validity of the two-way translated Finnish HIP (HIP-F) was evaluated by five nurses and four patients with SMI using cognitive debriefing (to assess the clarity and relevance of each item and the recommended actions of the HIP tool). The potential clinical utility was assessed using a pilot test involving 47 patients. The prevalence of red-flagged (risk) items in the whole sample, across female and male participants, and the frequencies of any type of missing item response were calculated and analysed using descriptive statistics. A chi-square test was used to determine differences in frequencies of red-flagged items across genders.

resultsBased on the cognitive debriefing, the HIP-F was found to have moderate content validity regarding the clarity and relevance of the items and recommended actions (the average scale level content validity index, S-CVI/Ave, 0.74). In the pilot test, some missing item responses were identified, but in the sample, nurses identified 399 areas of health and health behaviour risks (mean 8.6 per patient) using the HIP-F. The most frequently red-flagged items were body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference (83.0%), smoking status (48.9%) and lipid levels (46.8%). Female patients had a higher frequency of red-flagged items than males in BMI (92.6% vs. 70.0%, p = 0.04) and waist circumference (96.3% vs. 65.0%, p = 0.01).

conclusionsThe results demonstrate that the Finnish HIP has moderate content validity and preliminary clinical utility for evaluating the physical health and health behaviours of people with SMI. The HIP-F findings help to sign-post evidence-based interventions for identified areas of concern. Additional nurse training may be necessary to realise the potential clinical utility of the tool in Finland.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorHealth StatusMental DisordersTranslationsFemaleFinlandHumansMaleMental Health ServicesReproducibility of ResultsAssessmentPhysical healthSevere mental illnessValidation

Identifiers

PMID32160873
PMCPMC7065367
OpenAlexW3012208220

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.