Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32165014›Full record

ReviewUltrasound in medicine & biology2020

Ultrasound-Responsive Cavitation Nuclei for Therapy and Drug Delivery.

Klazina Kooiman, Silke Roovers, Simone A G Langeveld, Robert T Kleven, Heleen Dewitte, Meaghan A O'Reilly, Jean-Michel Escoffre, Ayache Bouakaz, Martin D Verweij, Kullervo Hynynen and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 137 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
137citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

137 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Assessment of Cavitation From DEFINITY and DEFINITY RT.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Preclinical in-vivo cerebrovascular imaging in rodent models: Methods and applications in Alzheimer's disease.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

77 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Klazina KooimanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: k.kooiman@erasmusmc.nl.
Silke RooversGhent Research Group on Nanomedicines, Lab for General Biochemistry and Physical Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Simone A G LangeveldDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Robert T KlevenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Heleen DewitteGhent Research Group on Nanomedicines, Lab for General Biochemistry and Physical Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Laboratory for Molecular and Cellular Therapy, Medical School of the Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Jette, Belgium; Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Meaghan A O'ReillyPhysical Sciences Platform, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jean-Michel EscoffreUMR 1253, iBrain, Université de Tours, Inserm, Tours, France.
Ayache BouakazUMR 1253, iBrain, Université de Tours, Inserm, Tours, France.
Martin D VerweijDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Laboratory of Acoustical Wavefield Imaging, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
Kullervo HynynenPhysical Sciences Platform, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Ine LentackerGhent Research Group on Nanomedicines, Lab for General Biochemistry and Physical Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Eleanor StrideInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Christy K HollandDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Health and Disease, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.

Funding

Ultrasound-Assisted Thrombolysis for Stroke TherapyR01NS047603 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI HOLLAND, CHRISTY K. · 2004 to 2018
$7.5M
Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM063483 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI KHURANA HERSHEY, GURJIT K. · 2002 to 2022
$6.7M
Treatment of chronic venous thrombosis with histotripsy and thrombolyticsR01HL133334 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Kenneth B. Bader · 2018 to 2026
$5.7M
Echogenic Targeted Liposomes: Transfection/Drug DeliveryR01HL135092 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI David D McPherson · 2017 to 2026
$5.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL133334NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL135092NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM063483NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS047603
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Therapeutic ultrasound strategies that harness the mechanical activity of cavitation nuclei for beneficial tissue bio-effects are actively under development. The mechanical oscillations of circulating microbubbles, the most widely investigated cavitation nuclei, which may also encapsulate or shield a therapeutic agent in the bloodstream, trigger and promote localized uptake. Oscillating microbubbles can create stresses either on nearby tissue or in surrounding fluid to enhance drug penetration and efficacy in the brain, spinal cord, vasculature, immune system, biofilm or tumors. This review summarizes recent investigations that have elucidated interactions of ultrasound and cavitation nuclei with cells, the treatment of tumors, immunotherapy, the blood-brain and blood-spinal cord barriers, sonothrombolysis, cardiovascular drug delivery and sonobactericide. In particular, an overview of salient ultrasound features, drug delivery vehicles, therapeutic transport routes and pre-clinical and clinical studies is provided. Successful implementation of ultrasound and cavitation nuclei-mediated drug delivery has the potential to change the way drugs are administered systemically, resulting in more effective therapeutics and less-invasive treatments.

Indexed as

MicrobubblesBacterial InfectionsBlood-Brain BarrierCardiovascular AgentsDrug Delivery SystemsHumansImmunotherapyNeoplasmsThrombolytic TherapyUltrasonic TherapyCardiovascular AgentsBlood–brain barrier openingBubble–cell interactionCavitation nucleiDrug deliverySonobactericideSonoporationSonothrombolysisTherapyTumorUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID32165014
PMCPMC7189181

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.