Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32166554›Full record

ReviewCurrent diabetes reports2020

Intermittent Fasting as Part of the Management for T2DM: from Animal Models to Human Clinical Studies.

Liliana Muñoz-Hernández, Ziomara Márquez-López, Roopa Mehta, Carlos Alberto Aguilar-Salinas

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current diabetes reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Chrononutrition in Cardiometabolic Health.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Calorie Restriction as a New Treatment of Inflammatory Diseases.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Liliana Muñoz-HernándezMetabolic Diseases Research Unit, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion, Mexico City, Mexico.
Ziomara Márquez-LópezMetabolic Diseases Research Unit, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion, Mexico City, Mexico.
Roopa MehtaMetabolic Diseases Research Unit, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion, Mexico City, Mexico.
Carlos Alberto Aguilar-SalinasMetabolic Diseases Research Unit, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion, Mexico City, Mexico. caguilarsalinas@yahoo.com.
Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán · MXTecnológico de Monterrey · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewDiet is a pillar of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) management. Intermittent fasting (IF) is postulated as a novel approach, able to improve glucose control and potentially capable of reversing some of the pathophysiological alterations of this condition. In this review, the molecular and clinical evidence of diets based on intermittent energy restriction (IER) in laboratory animal models and subjects with type 2 diabetes is discussed. The mechanisms through which IF are thought to improve glucose homeostasis and reverse β cell failure are also reviewed. RECENT

findingsStudies derived from murine models suggest that IER is associated with improvements in β cell function and insulin resistance. Two main mechanisms have been demonstrated, one derived from the autophagy-lysosome pathway and, the other from an increase in neurogenin3 (Ngn3) levels (a marker for endocrine progenitor cells like β cells during development). Notably, IER also promotes reconstruction of gut microbiota. In mice, all effects were independent of weight loss. By contrast, in human studies, outcomes are widely attributable to weight loss. The more consistent results are reductions in body weight, visceral fat, and glucose and insulin levels. Increases in HDL cholesterol levels are also frequently reported. The decrease in insulin levels observed in humans is in opposition with the increase reported in mice, suggesting that the main mechanism in humans is an improvement in peripheral insulin action. Recommending diets based on intermittent fasting in humans is based on the promising results found in animal models where an improvement in β cell function has been recorded. β cell function after IF has not been assessed in human subjects with T2DM. This review provides information regarding different protocols for the implementation of IF in diabetic persons and also provides important safety advice in order to avoid adverse effects. Clinical studies do not show an increased risk of hypoglycemia, and a recent case series reported reversal of T2DM.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlood GlucoseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Disease Models, AnimalFastingHomeostasisHumansInsulin ResistanceMiceBlood GlucoseAlternate-day fastingFasting-mimicking dietsIntermittent energy restrictionIntermittent fastingTime-restricted feedingType 2 diabetes remission

Identifiers

PMID32166554
OpenAlexW3010806244

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.