Evidence mapPaperPMID 32184584Full record

ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2020

Translation and Cultural Adaptation of PROactive Instruments for COPD in French and Influence of Weather and Pollution on Its Difficulty Score.

Trija Vaidya, Véronique Thomas-Ollivier, François Hug, Alain Bernady, Camille Le Blanc, Claire de Bisschop, Arnaud Chambellan

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Processing of Sedentary Time and Its Reference Equation in Patients with COPD.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2024
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Cultural adaptation and validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the PROactive Physical Activity in COPD-clinical visit instrument for individuals with COPD.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Trija VaidyaLaboratory MOVE (EA6314), Université de Poitiers, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Poitiers, France.ORCID 0000-0001-8527-2918
Véronique Thomas-OllivierFaculty of Sport Sciences, Movement-Interactions-Performance, MIP, EA 4334, Université de Nantes, Nantes F-4000, France.
François HugFaculty of Sport Sciences, Movement-Interactions-Performance, MIP, EA 4334, Université de Nantes, Nantes F-4000, France.
Alain BernadyToki-Eder Centre Médical Cardio-Respiratoire, Cambo-Les-Bains, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3721-6812
Camille Le BlancPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, University Hospital of Nantes, Nantes, France.
Claire de BisschopLaboratory MOVE (EA6314), Université de Poitiers, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Poitiers, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6815-0660
Arnaud ChambellanFaculty of Sport Sciences, Movement-Interactions-Performance, MIP, EA 4334, Université de Nantes, Nantes F-4000, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes · FRUniversité de Poitiers · FRInstitut Universitaire de France · FRKai Research (United States) · USNantes Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The recently developed daily and clinical visit PROactive physical activity in COPD (PPAC) instruments are hybrid tools to objectively quantify the level of physical activity and the difficulties experienced in everyday life. Our aim was to translate these instruments for the French-speaking chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) community worldwide and evaluate the influence of weather and pollution on difficulty score. Methods: The translation procedure was conducted following the guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation process. The translated clinical visit (C-PPAC) was tested among COPD patients in France. A retest was conducted after an interval of at least 2 weeks. The C-PPAC difficulty score was then tested to see how sensitive it was to the influence of weather and outdoor pollution. Results: One hundred and seventeen COPD patients (age 65±9 years; FEV1: 51±20%) from 9 regions in France were included. The French version of C-PPAC was found comprehensible by the patients with an average score of 4.8/5 on a Likert-scale. It showed good internal consistency with Cronbach's α>0.90 and a good test retest reliability with an intraclass correlation coefficient of ≥0.80. The difficulty score was negatively correlated with duration of daylight ( Conclusion: The French versions of the questionnaires of the PPAC instruments are accepted and comprehensible to COPD patients. The difficulty score of C-PPAC is sensitive to duration of daylight and rainfall. Such weather factors must be taken into consideration when evaluating the physical activity behavior using these tools in COPD.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingAir PollutionCultural CharacteristicsExerciseHealth Status IndicatorsSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslatingWeatherAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleForced Expiratory VolumeFranceHumansLungMaleCOPDphysical activityquestionnairereliability

Identifiers

PMID32184584
PMCPMC7060774
OpenAlexW3009481094

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.