Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32187155›Full record

ReviewPharmacogenetics and genomics2020

PharmGKB summary: lamotrigine pathway, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

Taraswi Mitra-Ghosh, Samuel P Callisto, Jatinder K Lamba, Rory P Remmel, Angela K Birnbaum, Julia M Barbarino, Teri E Klein, Russ B Altman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacogenetics and genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Understanding Lamotrigine's Role in the CNS and Possible Future Evolution.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Taraswi Mitra-GhoshDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Minnesota Minneapolis.
Samuel P CallistoDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Minnesota Minneapolis.
Jatinder K LambaDepartment of Pharmacotherapy and Translational Research, University of Florida Gainesville, Florida.
Rory P RemmelDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Minnesota Minneapolis.
Angela K BirnbaumDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, University of Minnesota Minneapolis.
Julia M BarbarinoDepartments of Biomedical Data Sciences.
Teri E KleinDepartments of Biomedical Data Sciences.
Russ B AltmanDepartments of Biomedical Data Sciences.

Funding

PharmGKB: pharmacogenomics knowledge for precision medicineR24GM061374 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ALTMAN, RUSS BIAGIO, KLEIN, TERI ELLEN · 2010 to 2018
$25.2M
TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH PSEUDO-SEIZURESP50NS016308 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI CLOYD, JAMES C. · 1985 to 2006
$8.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R24 GM061374NINDS NIH HHS P50 NS016308
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AnticonvulsantsATP-Binding Cassette TransportersBrainCalcium Channels, Q-TypeHumansLamotrigineMonosaccharide Transport ProteinsPolymorphism, GeneticReceptors, GABAUDP-Galactose TranslocatorsAnticonvulsantsATP-Binding Cassette TransportersCalcium Channels, Q-TypeLamotrigineMonosaccharide Transport ProteinsReceptors, GABAUDP-Galactose Translocators

Identifiers

PMID32187155
PMCPMC10258870

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.