Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32194972›Full record

ReviewHorticulture research2020

Perspectives of CRISPR/Cas-mediated

Qiang Li, Manoj Sapkota, Esther van der Knaap

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Horticulture research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Transcription factor-promoter interactions forbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. CRISPR/Cas as a Genome-Editing Technique in Fruit Tree Breeding.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. CRISPR/Cas9-MediatedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Expanding Gene-Editing Potential in Crop Improvement with Pangenomes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Qiang Li1College of Horticultural Science and Engineering, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai'an, China.
Manoj Sapkota3Institute for Plant Breeding, Genetics and Genomics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA USA.
Esther van der Knaap2Center for Applied Genetic Technologies, University of Georgia, Athens, GA USA.
Applied Genetic Technologies (United States) · USShandong Agricultural University · CNUniversity of Georgia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Directed breeding of horticultural crops is essential for increasing yield, nutritional content, and consumer-valued characteristics such as shape and color of the produce. However, limited genetic diversity restricts the amount of crop improvement that can be achieved through conventional breeding approaches. Natural genetic changes in

Indexed as

Molecular engineering in plantsPlant breeding

Identifiers

PMID32194972
PMCPMC7072075
OpenAlexW3011234714

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.