Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32200537›Full record

SynthesisAdvances in therapy2020

Proportion of High-Risk/Very High-Risk Patients in Europe with Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol at Target According to European Guidelines: A Systematic Review.

Eric Bruckert, Klaus Georg Parhofer, Jose Ramon Gonzalez-Juanatey, Børge Nordestgaard, Marcello Arca, Periklis Giovas, Kausik Ray

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Advances in therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Therapeutic inertia.Australian prescriber · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Inclisiran: A Review in Hypercholesterolemia.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eric BruckertEndocrinologie Métabolisme et Prévention Cardiovasculaire, Institut E3M et IHU Cardiométabolique (ICAN), Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France. eric.bruckert@aphp.fr.
Klaus Georg ParhoferMedizinische Klinik IV-Grosshadern, Klinikum der Universität München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Jose Ramon Gonzalez-JuanateyCardiology and Intensive Cardiac Care Department, CIBERCV, University Hospital, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Børge NordestgaardDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Marcello ArcaDepartment of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, UOS Atherosclerosis Center, La Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Periklis GiovasAmgen Europe GmbH, Rotkreuz, Switzerland.
Kausik RayDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Imperial Centre for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAssess achievement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets in European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) guidelines.

designSystematic literature review. DATA SOURCES: Medline, EMBASE, Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Observational studies reporting LDL-C levels/target attainment, measured between 1 August 2006 to 31 August 2017, in European adults with established cardiovascular disease (CVD), diabetes with target organ damage, familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) or 10-year risk of fatal CVD ≥ 5% (assessed by Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation [SCORE]). DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two reviewers independently extracted relevant studies and assessed study quality using the Risk of Bias for Non-Randomised Studies-Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving LDL-C targets in the 2011/2016 ESC/EAS guidelines. Where available, patient characteristics were presented as means weighted by sample size. The proportions of patients achieving LDL-C targets in the 5 years before and after publication of the 2011 guidelines were compared using a chi-square test.

resultsAcross 81 eligible studies (303,534 patients), achievement of LDL-C < 1.8 mmol/L was poor among patients with established CVD (16%; range 9-56%) and at very high risk of CVD (SCORE ≥ 10% [18%; 14-25%]). In individuals with FH, SCORE 5-10%, or diabetes and target organ damage, LDL-C < 2.5 mmol/L was achieved by 15% (9-22%), 46% (21-55%) and 13% (6-34%), respectively. Comparing the 5 years before/after publication of the 2011 guidelines, target achievement increased significantly over time but remained suboptimal (LDL-C < 1.8, 22% versus 15%; LDL-C < 2.5, 68% versus 61%; both p < 0.001; established CVD group only).

conclusionsThese data show suboptimal LDL-C control among European patients at high risk of CVD. Those at greatest overall risk (clinically established CVD or at least a 10% 10-year risk of fatal CVD) had the lowest achievement of 2011/2016 EAS/ESC LDL-C targets. With lower LDL-C targets advocated in 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines, this unmet need will increase. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number; CRD77844.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCardiovascular DiseasesCholesterol, LDLEuropeFemaleHumansHyperlipoproteinemia Type IIMaleMedication Therapy ManagementMiddle AgedPractice Guidelines as TopicRisk FactorsCholesterol, LDLCardiovascular diseaseGuidelinesHigh-riskLDL-C targetsLow-density lipoprotein cholesterolSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID32200537
PMCPMC7467492

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.