ReviewBMJ global health2020
Toward improving respectful maternity care: a discrete choice experiment with rural women in northeast Nigeria.
Review in BMJ global health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Preferences of women for maternal healthcare services in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review of discrete choice experiments.BMJ global health · 2025Pooled it
- The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.PharmacoEconomics · 2025Pooled it
- Stated Preference Research in Reproductive and Maternal Healthcare Services in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review.The patient · 2022Pooled it
- Preferences of Women for Maternal Health Services in Sidama Region, Ethiopia: Discrete Choice Experiment.Applied health economics and health policy · 2026Article
- "I went to the primary health centre close to my workplace, but their capacity cannot deliver the baby": exploring why women choose different providers for maternal health services in Nigeria.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Exploring Adolescents' Contraceptive Preferences and Trade-Offs: Findings From a Discrete Choice Experiment in Kenya.Studies in family planning · 2025Article
- Experiences with facility delivery services within the context of a maternal neonatal health project in Gombe State, Northeast Nigeria: a qualitative study.The Pan African medical journal · 2025Article
- Article
- Preferences for Living Arrangements in Dementia: A Discrete Choice Experiment.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2024Article
- Understanding rural women's preferences for telephone call engagement with primary health care providers in Nigeria: a discrete choice experiment.BMJ global health · 2023Article
- Patterns and predictors of cultural competence practice among Nigerian hospital-based healthcare professionals.BMC medical education · 2023Article
- Women's perceptions of telephone interviews about their experiences with childbirth care in Nigeria: A qualitative study.PLOS global public health · 2023Article
- Investigating patients' preferences for new anti-diabetic drugs to inform public health insurance coverage decisions: a discrete choice experiment in China.BMC public health · 2022Article
- Women's preferences for antenatal care in Tanzania: a discrete choice experiment.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Article
- To call or not to call: exploring the validity of telephone interviews to derive maternal self-reports of experiences with facility childbirth care in northern Nigeria.BMJ global health · 2022Article
- Preferences for healthcare services among hypertension patients in China: a discrete choice experiment.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: There is a limited understanding of the importance of respectful maternity care on utilisation of maternal and newborn health services. This study aimed to determine how specific hypothetical facility birth experience of care attributes influenced rural Nigerian women's stated preferences for hypothetical place of delivery. Methods: Attributes were identified through a comprehensive review of the literature. These attributes and their respective levels were further investigated in a qualitative study. We then developed and implemented a cross-sectional discrete choice experiment with a random sample of 426 women who had facility-based childbirth to elicit their stated preferences for facility birth experience of care attributes. Women were asked to choose between two hypothetical health facilities or home birth for future delivery. Choice data were analysed using multinomial logit and mixed multinomial logit models. Results: Complete data for the discrete choice experiment were available for 425 of 426 women. The majority belonged to Fulani ethnic group (60%) and were married (95%). Almost half (45%) had no formal education. Parameter estimates were all of expected signs suggesting internal validity. The most important influence on choice of place of delivery was good health system condition, followed by absence of sexual abuse, then absence of physical and verbal abuse. Poor facility culture, including an unclean birth environment with no privacy and unclear user fee, was associated with the most disutility and had the most negative impact on preferences for facility-based childbirth. Conclusion: The likelihood of poor facility birth experiences had a significant impact on stated preferences for place of delivery among rural women in northeast Nigeria. The study findings further underline the important relationship between facility birth experience and utilisation. Achieving universal health coverage would require efforts toward addressing poor facility birth experiences and promoting respectful maternity care, to ensure women want to access the services available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.