Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32204540›Full record

SynthesisSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Smartphone Apps in the Context of Tinnitus: Systematic Review.

Muntazir Mehdi, Constanze Riha, Patrick Neff, Albi Dode, Rüdiger Pryss, Winfried Schlee, Manfred Reichert, Franz J Hauck

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evaluating the accuracy of a self-administered smartphone hearing test application in a geriatric population.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Tinnitus Guidelines and Their Evidence Base.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Muntazir MehdiInstitute of Distributed Systems, Ulm University, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Constanze RihaDepartment of Psychology, University of Zürich, Box 1, CH-8050 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6006-7018
Patrick NeffClinic and Polyclinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3174-4910
Albi DodeInstitute of Databases and Information Systems, Ulm University, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Rüdiger PryssInstitute of Databases and Information Systems, Ulm University, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Winfried SchleeClinic and Polyclinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Manfred ReichertInstitute of Databases and Information Systems, Ulm University, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Franz J HauckInstitute of Distributed Systems, Ulm University, 89081 Ulm, Germany.

Funding

Horizon 2020 722064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smartphones containing sophisticated high-end hardware and offering high computational capabilities at extremely manageable costs have become mainstream and an integral part of users' lives. Widespread adoption of smartphone devices has encouraged the development of many smartphone applications, resulting in a well-established ecosystem, which is easily discoverable and accessible via respective marketplaces of differing mobile platforms. These smartphone applications are no longer exclusively limited to entertainment purposes but are increasingly established in the scientific and medical field. In the context of tinnitus, the ringing in the ear, these smartphone apps range from relief, management, self-help, all the way to interfacing external sensors to better understand the phenomenon. In this paper, we aim to bring forth the smartphone applications in and around tinnitus. Based on the PRISMA guidelines, we systematically analyze and investigate the current state of smartphone apps, that are directly applied in the context of tinnitus. In particular, we explore Google Scholar, CiteSeerX, Microsoft Academics, Semantic Scholar for the identification of scientific contributions. Additionally, we search and explore Google's Play and Apple's App Stores to identify relevant smartphone apps and their respective properties. This review work gives (1) an up-to-date overview of existing apps, and (2) lists and discusses scientific literature pertaining to the smartphone apps used within the context of tinnitus.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesMobile ApplicationsSmartphoneHumansTinnitusbiomedical and health informaticsmobile healthsmartphone appstinnitus research

Identifiers

PMID32204540
PMCPMC7146490

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.