Observational studyAnnals of epidemiology2020
Cholesterol-lowering effect of statin therapy in a clinical HIV cohort: an application of double propensity score adjustment.
Observational study in Annals of epidemiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gender Differences in Statin Discontinuation and Adherence Among Privately Insured People with HIV in the USA.Journal of general internal medicine · 2026 · on this mapObservational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposePropensity score matching (PSM) is often used to estimate the average treatment effect among the treated (ATT) using observational data. We demonstrate how the use of "double propensity score adjustment" can reduce residual confounding and avoid bias due to incomplete matching compared with traditional PSM methods.
methodsThe DC Cohort is an observational clinical HIV cohort in Washington, DC. We compared the mean percent change in non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) concentration after 3-12 months between participants treated and participants not treated with statin therapy between 2011 and 2018. We conducted traditional PSM procedures (optimal, nearest neighbor, and nearest neighbor caliper matching) and double propensity score adjustment.
resultsAmong 202 treated and 1252 untreated participants, the ATT was -14.5% (95% CI: -18.4, -10.6) after optimal matching (202 matched pairs; 15/22 covariates balanced), -14.9% (-18.9, -11.0) after nearest neighbor matching (202 matched pairs; 17/22 covariates balanced), and -12.0% (-16.5, -7.5) after nearest neighbor caliper matching (153 matched pairs; 21/22 covariates balanced). After double propensity score adjustment, the ATT was -13.0% (-16.0, -10.1).
conclusionsIn PSM analyses, double propensity score adjustment is a readily accessible alternative approach for estimating ATTs when sufficient covariate balance between treatment groups cannot be achieved without excluding treated participants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.