Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32215027›Full record

ArticleIranian journal of pathology2020

Changes in Cytokeratin 18 during Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy of Breast Cancer: A Prospective Study.

Danial Fazilat-Panah, Somaye Vakili Ahrari Roudi, Alireza Keramati, Azar Fanipakdel, Mohammad Hadi Sadeghian, Fatemeh Homaei Shandiz, Soodabeh Shahidsales, Seyed Alireza Javadinia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Iranian journal of pathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Danial Fazilat-PanahCancer Research Center, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.
Somaye Vakili Ahrari RoudiDepartment of Pathology, Student Research Committee, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Alireza KeramatiDepartment of Radio-Oncology, Student Research Committee, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Azar FanipakdelCancer Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Mohammad Hadi SadeghianDepartment of Pathology, Student Research Committee, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Fatemeh Homaei ShandizCancer Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Soodabeh ShahidsalesCancer Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Seyed Alireza JavadiniaCellular and Molecular Research Center, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND &

objectivePrediction of response to neoadjuvant treatment is an important part of treatment of patients with breast cancer. This study aimed to assess changes in serum levels of Cytokeratin 18 during neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer and its association with neoadjuvant treatments.

methodsThis research was performed on newly diagnosed breast cancer patients referred to Omid Radiotherapy Center and radiotherapy and oncology departments of Emam Reza and Ghaem hospitals, in Mashhad, Iran. Serum levels of M30 and M65 fragments of Cytokeratin 18 were measured before and 24 hours after the first course of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Changes in serum levels of Cytokeratin 18 and its fragments and their correlation with pathologic response were analyzed.

resultsPre- and post-chemotherapy levels of M30 were respectively 223.9±18.94 and 250.7±23.92 U/L (

conclusionOur findings showed statistically insignificant changes in the level of Caspase-cleaved- (M30) and uncleaved- (M65) cytokeratin 18 fragments (apoptotic and necrotic indicators, respectively) during neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. There was no notable relationship between tumor-related factors and either baseline levels or serum changes of CK18 fragments. Also, there was no correlation between M30/M65 level and pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Indexed as

Breast carcinomaCytokeratin-18M30 cytokeratin-18 peptideM65 cytokeratin-18 peptideNeoadjuvant therapy

Identifiers

PMID32215027
PMCPMC7081760

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.