Evidence mapPaperPMID 32215879Full record

ArticleHigh blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension2020

Central Blood Pressure Waves Assessment: A Validation Study of Non-invasive Aortic Pressure Measurement in Human Beings.

Ramiro Sánchez, Franco Pessana, Gabriel Lev, Micaela Mirada, Oscar Mendiz, Agustín Ramírez, Edmundo Cabrera Fischer

Abstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Comparison between invasive and non-invasive assessment of blood pressure in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ramiro SánchezMetabolic Unit and Hypertension Unit, University Hospital, Favaloro Foundation, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Franco PessanaIMETTYB Favaloro University-CONICET, Solís 453 (1078), Buenos Aires, Argentina. fpessana@favaloro.edu.ar.
Gabriel LevElectronic Department, Buenos Aires Regional Faculty, National Technological University, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Micaela MiradaMetabolic Unit and Hypertension Unit, University Hospital, Favaloro Foundation, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Oscar MendizHemodynamic Department, University Hospital, Favaloro Foundation, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Agustín RamírezMetabolic Unit and Hypertension Unit, University Hospital, Favaloro Foundation, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Edmundo Cabrera FischerIMETTYB Favaloro University-CONICET, Solís 453 (1078), Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMeasurement of central (aortic) systolic blood pressure has been shown to provide reliable information to evaluate target organ damage. However, non-invasive central blood pressure measurement procedures are still under analysis.

aimTo compare human pressure waveforms invasively obtained in the aorta, with the corresponding waveforms non-invasively recorded using an oscillometric device (Mobil-O-Graph).

methodsIn this research were included 20 subjects in which invasive percutaneous coronary interventions were performed. They were 10 males (68 ± 12 y. o. , BMI: 27.4 ± 4.6 kg/m , BMI: 28.5 ± 5.3 kg/m

resultsA significant correlation between Mobil-O-Graph central blood pressure measurements and the corresponding invasive values was found in males (r < 0.81; p < 0.01) and females (r < 0.93; p < 0.01). However, in both genders, the slope of the regression lines was lesser than 1 (males: y = 0.7354x + 18.998; females: y = 0.9835x + 2.8432). In the whole population (n = 20), a significant correlation between Mobil-O-Graph central blood pressure measurements and the corresponding invasive values was found (r < 0.89; p < 0.01) and the regression line was lesser than 1 (y = 0.9774x + 1.7603).

conclusionsIn this research, a high correlation between invasive central blood pressure values and those measured with the Mobil-O-Graph device was found in males, females and the whole population. However, a sub estimation of Mobil-O-Graph central blood pressure values was observed.

Indexed as

Arterial PressureBlood Pressure DeterminationPulse Wave AnalysisAgedAged, 80 and overAortaCoronary Artery DiseaseFemaleHeart RateHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedOscillometryPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPredictive Value of TestsAortic blood pressureAortic central pressureMobil-O-GraphValidation analysis

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.