Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32225004›Full record

ReviewCells2020

Human γδ TCR Repertoires in Health and Disease.

Alina Suzann Fichtner, Sarina Ravens, Immo Prinz

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Enrichment of CD4iScience · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Harnessing Vδ1Frontiers in immunology · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Enrichment of a CD4bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alina Suzann FichtnerInstitute of Immunology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
Sarina RavensInstitute of Immunology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany.
Immo PrinzInstitute of Immunology, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8789-9578
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The T cell receptor (TCR) repertoires of γδ T cells are very different to those of αβ T cells. While the theoretical TCR repertoire diversity of γδ T cells is estimated to exceed the diversity of αβ T cells by far, γδ T cells are still understood as more invariant T cells that only use a limited set of γδ TCRs. Most of our current knowledge of human γδ T cell receptor diversity builds on specific monoclonal antibodies that discriminate between the two major subsets, namely Vδ2

Indexed as

DiseaseHealthEmbryonic DevelopmentHumansInfectionsReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, gamma-deltaT-Lymphocyte SubsetsReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, gamma-deltainnate T cellsTCR diversityγδ T cellsγδ TCR repertoires

Identifiers

PMID32225004
PMCPMC7226320
OpenAlexW3013030661

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.