Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32225115›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Added Value of Clinical Sequencing: WGS-Based Profiling of Pharmacogenes.

Sylvan M Caspar, Timo Schneider, Janine Meienberg, Gabor Matyas

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Pharmacogenetics at Scale: An Analysis of the UK Biobank.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sylvan M CasparCenter for Cardiovascular Genetics and Gene Diagnostics; Foundation for People with Rare Diseases, 8952 Schlieren-Zurich, Switzerland.
Timo SchneiderCenter for Cardiovascular Genetics and Gene Diagnostics; Foundation for People with Rare Diseases, 8952 Schlieren-Zurich, Switzerland.
Janine MeienbergCenter for Cardiovascular Genetics and Gene Diagnostics; Foundation for People with Rare Diseases, 8952 Schlieren-Zurich, Switzerland.
Gabor MatyasCenter for Cardiovascular Genetics and Gene Diagnostics; Foundation for People with Rare Diseases, 8952 Schlieren-Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3212-9963
Foundation for People with Rare Diseases · CHETH Zurich · CHUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

Clariant Foundation NAErnst Göhner Stiftung NAFondation pour la Recherche et le Traitement Médical (FRTM) NAGebauer Stiftung NALotteriefonds ZH NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although several pharmacogenetic (PGx) predispositions affecting drug efficacy and safety are well established, drug selection and dosing as well as clinical trials are often performed in a non-pharmacogenetically-stratified manner, ultimately burdening healthcare systems. Pre-emptive PGx testing offers a solution which is often performed using microarrays or targeted gene panels, testing for common/known PGx variants. However, as an added value, whole-genome sequencing (WGS) could detect not only disease-causing but also pharmacogenetically-relevant variants in a single assay. Here, we present our WGS-based pipeline that extends the genetic testing of Mendelian diseases with PGx profiling, enabling the detection of rare/novel PGx variants as well. From our in-house WGS (PCR-free 60× PE150) data of 547 individuals we extracted PGx variants with drug-dosing recommendations of the Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group (DPWG). Furthermore, we explored the landscape of DPWG pharmacogenes in gnomAD and our in-house cohort as well as compared bioinformatic tools for WGS-based structural variant detection in

Indexed as

Pharmacogenomic VariantsCytochrome P-450 CYP2D6Genetic TestingHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansWhole Genome SequencingCytochrome P-450 CYP2D6CYP2D6DPWGgnomADnext-generation sequencingPGxpharmacogeneticsprecision medicinewhole-genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID32225115
PMCPMC7178228
OpenAlexW3014027704

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.