Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32235339›Full record

ArticlePharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Efficacy of

Pierre-Antoine Mariage, Areg Hovhannisyan, Alexander G Panossian

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Advances in Research onInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Recent trends in ginseng research.Journal of natural medicines · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pierre-Antoine MariageBotalys SA, 8 quai des usines, 7800 Ath, Belgium.
Areg HovhannisyanSport Medicine and Antidoping Service Republican Centre, Yerevan 0001, Armenia.
Alexander G PanossianPhytomed AB, Bofinkvagen 1, Vaxtorp 31275, Sweden.
Ideon Science Park · SENational Statistical Service of the Republic of Armenia · AM

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this pilot study was to compare the efficacy of hydroponically cultivated red

methodsThe effects of HRG80, PGS, and placebo capsules were studied in 50 tired healthy subjects in a three-arm, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled crossover trial. Efficacy-outcome measures included the accuracy of processing the d2 test for cognitive functions, obtained accuracy score in a computerized memory test, and the perceived-stress (PS) score.

resultsA statistically significant interaction effect between time and treatment (

conclusionOverall, HRG80 treatment was significantly superior compared to that with the PGS and placebo regarding attention, memory, and PS scores after single and repeated administrations for 5 and 12 days.

Indexed as

cognitive performancefatiguehydroponic cultivationPanax ginsengstress

Identifiers

PMID32235339
PMCPMC7243122
OpenAlexW3012978751

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.