ArticleAIDS research and therapy2020
Real-world adherence and persistence for newly-prescribed HIV treatment: single versus multiple tablet regimen comparison among US medicaid beneficiaries.
Article in AIDS research and therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis of INSTI-Based Antiretroviral Therapy Single- Versus Multiple-Tablet Regimens for the Treatment of HIV.Advances in therapy · 2026Pooled it
- Preferences of People Living with HIV for Long-Acting Antiretroviral Treatment in Germany: Evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment.The patient · 2023Pooled it
- Contemporary Single and Multi-Tablet HIV Treatment Regimens Are Associated With Similar Levels of Viral Suppression.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Trial
- Efficacy and Safety of Switching to Daily Bictegravir Plus Lenacapavir From a Complex HIV Treatment Regimen: A Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter Phase 2 Study (ARTISTRY-1).Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025Trial
- EVG/COBI/FTC/TAF Bioequivalence Comparing Whole Tablets with Tablets Dissolved in Tap Water.AIDS research and human retroviruses · 2023Trial
- Clinical Characteristics, Healthcare Utilization, and Treatment Patterns Among People Living with HIV by Antiretroviral Therapy Use in the USA, 2021-2024.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2026Article
- Prevalence of and Time to Suboptimal Treatment Patterns Among People with HIV on Antiretroviral Therapy in the United States.AIDS and behavior · 2026Observational
- Antiretroviral therapy switch among Medicare beneficiaries with HIV.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Relative Bioavailability and Food Effect of a Fixed-Dose Combination Tablet of Islatravir and Lenacapavir.Journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Antiretroviral therapy persistence among treatment-experienced people with HIV and mental health disorders and/or substance use disorders in the USA (2017-2024): a retrospective cohort study.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2026Article
- Burden of comorbid disease, treatment, and healthcare utilization among people with HIV: A retrospective, cross-sectional study from a large healthcare organization.Epidemiology and infection · 2026Article
- Article
- Association of concomitant pill burden with antiretroviral adherence and persistence: retrospective analysis of a Japanese claims database.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Antiretroviral Treatment Switch Among Treatment-Experienced People with HIV.Journal of health economics and outcomes research · 2026Article
- Treatment Persistence and Switch Among Medicare-Insured People with HIV and Gaps in Care.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2026Article
- Real-world persistence of bictegravir versus dolutegravir single-tablet regimens: A retrospective cohort study in a large urban Canadian HIV clinic.International journal of STD & AIDS · 2026Article
- Biomarkers influence kidney function estimates more so than race among persons with HIV.AIDS research and therapy · 2025Article
- Characterizing treatment interruptions in the OPERA cohort and virologic outcomes after resumption with bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide.AIDS research and therapy · 2025Article
- Predictors of virological outcomes in patients with HIV on antiretroviral therapy in Osogbo, Nigeria: a cross-sectional study.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Coformulated Bictegravir, Emtricitabine, and Tenofovir Alafenamide Introduced at the First Clinical Visit: A Real-Life Single-Arm Single-center Retrospective Cohort Study.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOnce-daily, single-tablet regimens (STRs) have been associated with improved patient outcomes compared to multi-tablet regimens (MTRs). This study evaluated real world adherence and persistence of HIV antiretroviral therapy (ART), comparing STRs and MTRs.
methodsAdult Medicaid beneficiaries (aged ≥ 18 years) initiating ART with ≥ 2 ART claims during the identification period (January 1, 2015-December 31, 2016) and continuous health plan enrollment for a 12-month baseline period were included. For STRs, the first ART claim date was defined as the index date; for MTRs, the prescription fill claim date for the last drug in the regimen was defined as the index date, and prescription fills were required to occur within a 5-day window. Adherence was assessed in 30-day intervals over a 6-month period, with adherence defined as having less than a 5-day gap between fills. Persistence was evaluated as median number of days on therapy and percent persistence at 12 months. Cox Proportional Hazard models were used to evaluate risk of discontinuation, controlling for baseline and clinical characteristics.
resultsA total of 1,744 (STR = 1290; MTR = 454) and 2409 (STR = 1782; MTR = 627) patients newly prescribed ART had available data concerning adherence and persistence, respectively. Average age ranged 40-42 years. The patient population was predominantly male. Adherence assessments showed 22.7% of STR initiators were adherent to their index regimens over a 6-month period compared to 11.7% of MTR initiators. Unadjusted persistence analysis showed 36.3% of STR initiators discontinued first-line therapy compared to 48.8% for MTR initiators over the 2-year study period. Controlling for baseline demographic and clinical characteristics, MTR initiators had a higher risk of treatment discontinuation (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.6, p < 0.0001). Among STRs, compared to the referent elvitegravir(EVG)/cobicistat(COBI)/emtricitabine(FTC)/tenofovir alafenamide(TAF), risk of discontinuation was higher for efavirenz(EFV)/FTC/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate(TDF) (HR = 3.6, p < 0.0001), EVG/COBI/FTC/TDF (HR = 2.8, p < 0.0001), and abacavir (ABC)/lamivudine (3TC)/dolutegravir (DTG) (HR = 1.8, p = 0.004). Among backbones, FTC/TAF was associated with lower risk of discontinuation than FTC/TDF (HR = 4.4, p < 0.0001) and ABC/3TC (HR = 2.2, p < 0.0001).
conclusionsAmong patients newly prescribed ART, STR initiators were significantly less likely to discontinue therapy and had greater adherence and persistence compared to MTR initiators. Regimens containing FTC/TAF as a backbone had higher persistence than those consisting of other backbones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.