Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32240220›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2020

Predictive value of cystatin C and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin in contrast-induced nephropathy: A meta-analysis.

Yi He, Yunzhen Deng, Kaiting Zhuang, Siyao Li, Jing Xi, Junxiang Chen

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yi HeDepartment of Nephrology, Hunan Key Laboratory of Kidney Disease and Blood Purification, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Yunzhen DengDepartment of Nephrology, Hunan Key Laboratory of Kidney Disease and Blood Purification, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Kaiting ZhuangDepartment of Nephrology, Hunan Key Laboratory of Kidney Disease and Blood Purification, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Siyao LiDepartment of Nephrology, Hunan Key Laboratory of Kidney Disease and Blood Purification, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Jing XiDepartment of Nephrology, Hunan Key Laboratory of Kidney Disease and Blood Purification, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Junxiang ChenDepartment of Nephrology, Hunan Key Laboratory of Kidney Disease and Blood Purification, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7146-2526
Central South University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are still limited studies comprehensively examining the diagnostic performance of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) and cystatin C in contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). The study aimed to investigate and compare the predictive value of NGAL and cystatin C in the early diagnosis of CIN. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We searched the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases until November 10, 2019. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed by the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Bivariate modeling and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) modeling were performed to summarize and compare the diagnostic performance of blood/urine NGAL and serum cystatin C in CIN. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed according to the study and patient characteristics.

resultsThirty-seven studies from thirty-one original studies were included (blood NGAL, 1840 patients in 9 studies; urine NGAL, 1701 patients in 10 studies; serum cystatin C, 5509 patients in 18 studies). Overall, serum cystatin C performed better than serum/urine NGAL (pooled DOR: 43 (95%CI: 12-152); AUROC: 0.93; λ: 3.79); serum and urine NGAL had a similar diagnostic performance (pooled DOR: 25 (95%CI: 6-108)/22(95%CI: 8-64); AUROC: 0.90/0.89; λ: 3.20/3.08). Meta-regression analysis indicated that the sources of heterogeneity might be CIN definition, assays, and nationalities.

conclusionBoth NGAL and cystatin C can serve as early diagnostic indicators of CIN, while cystatin C may perform better than NGAL.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryAnimalsCystatin CGelatinasesHumansLipocalinsNeutrophilsCystatin CGelatinasesLipocalins

Identifiers

PMID32240220
PMCPMC7117687
OpenAlexW3014887433

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.