Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32244377›Full record

ReviewCells2020

The Cuprizone Model: Dos and Do Nots.

Jiangshan Zhan, Teresa Mann, Sarah Joost, Newshan Behrangi, Marcus Frank, Markus Kipp

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jiangshan ZhanInstitute of Anatomy, Rostock University Medical Center, Gertrudenstrasse 9, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Teresa MannInstitute of Anatomy, Rostock University Medical Center, Gertrudenstrasse 9, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Sarah JoostInstitute of Anatomy, Rostock University Medical Center, Gertrudenstrasse 9, 18057 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8654-8904
Newshan BehrangiInstitute of Anatomy, Rostock University Medical Center, Gertrudenstrasse 9, 18057 Rostock, Germany.
Marcus FrankMedical Biology and Electron Microscopy Center, Rostock University Medical Center, Strempelstraße 14, 18057 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2517-4440
Markus KippInstitute of Anatomy, Rostock University Medical Center, Gertrudenstrasse 9, 18057 Rostock, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5043-9052

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system. Various pre-clinical models with different specific features of the disease are available to study MS pathogenesis and to develop new therapeutic options. During the last decade, the model of toxic demyelination induced by cuprizone has become more and more popular, and it has contributed substantially to our understanding of distinct yet important aspects of the MS pathology. Here, we aim to provide a practical guide on how to use the cuprizone model and which pitfalls should be avoided.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsBody WeightCuprizoneDemyelinating DiseasesGene Expression RegulationMultiple SclerosisCuprizonecuprizone modelhistological analysesmultiple sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID32244377
PMCPMC7226799

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.