Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32244472›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Food Safety Risk Information-Seeking Intention of WeChat Users in China.

Zhaohui Yang, Krishna P Paudel, Xiaowei Wen, Sangluo Sun, Yong Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhaohui YangCollege of Economics and Management, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Krishna P PaudelDepartment of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Louisiana State University (LSU) and LSU Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA.
Xiaowei WenCollege of Economics and Management, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Sangluo SunCollege of Economics and Management, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Yong WangCollege of Economics and Management, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Consumers' food safety risk information-seeking behavior plays a vital role in improving their food quality and safety awareness and preventing food safety risks. Based on the Risk Information Seeking and Processing Model (RISP), this paper empirically analyzes the food safety risk information-seeking intention of consumers in WeChat and influencing factors under the impact of food safety incidents. We use data from 774 WeChat users and apply the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) approach. We also conduct multigroup analysis with demographic characteristics as moderating variables. The results demonstrated that: (1) Risk perception (

Indexed as

Consumer BehaviorFood SafetyInformation Seeking BehaviorIntentionSocial MediaChinaFemaleHumansMalefood safetyRisk Information Seeking and Processing modelrisk perceptionWeChat user

Identifiers

PMID32244472
PMCPMC7177356

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.