Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32245265›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

The Roles of NO and H

Martin Kadlec, José Luis Ros-Santaella, Eliana Pintus

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Applications of laser technology in the manipulation of human spermatozoa.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. The Interaction of NO and HAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Role and Modulation of TRPV1 in Mammalian Spermatozoa: An Updated Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Martin KadlecDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Praha 6-Suchdol, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-3351-6401
José Luis Ros-SantaellaDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Praha 6-Suchdol, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-4186-7730
Eliana PintusDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Praha 6-Suchdol, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-8496-0820
Czech University of Life Sciences Prague · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After being historically considered as noxious agents, nitric oxide (NO) and hydrogen sulfide (H

Indexed as

AnimalsGasotransmittersHumansHydrogen SulfideMaleNitric OxideOxidation-ReductionOxidative StressReactive Nitrogen SpeciesSpermatozoaSulfurGasotransmittersHydrogen SulfideNitric OxideReactive Nitrogen SpeciesSulfurgasotransmittershydrogen sulfideinteractionmetabolismnitric oxidespermatozoa

Identifiers

PMID32245265
PMCPMC7139502
OpenAlexW3012350372

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.