Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32255186›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging2021

The remodelling index risk stratifies patients with hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy.

Thu-Thao Le, Vanessa Lim, Rositaa Ibrahim, Muh-Tyng Teo, Jennifer Bryant, Briana Ang, Boyang Su, Tar-Choon Aw, Chi-Hang Lee, Jeroen Bax and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular volumes: a comparison of different methods in athletes.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Thu-Thao LeDepartment of Cardiology, National Heart Center Singapore, Singapore.
Vanessa LimDepartment of Cardiology, National Heart Center Singapore, Singapore.
Rositaa IbrahimDepartment of Cardiology, National Heart Center Singapore, Singapore.
Muh-Tyng TeoDepartment of Cardiology, National Heart Center Singapore, Singapore.
Jennifer BryantDepartment of Cardiology, National Heart Center Singapore, Singapore.
Briana AngDepartment of Cardiology, National Heart Center Singapore, Singapore.
Boyang SuDepartment of Cardiology, National Heart Center Singapore, Singapore.
Tar-Choon AwDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore.
Chi-Hang LeeDepartment of Cardiology, National Heart Center Singapore, Singapore.
Jeroen BaxFaculty in Medicine, Leiden University, the Netherlands.
Stuart CookDepartment of Cardiology, National Heart Center Singapore, Singapore.
Calvin W L ChinDepartment of Cardiology, National Heart Center Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-9867-4390
National Heart Centre Singapore · SGDuke-NUS Medical School · SGChangi General Hospital · SGLeiden University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsHypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is associated with increased cardiovascular events. We previously developed the remodelling index (RI) that incorporated left ventricular (LV) volume and wall-thickness in a single measure of advanced hypertrophy in hypertensive patients. This study examined the prognostic potential of the RI in reference to contemporary LVH classifications. METHODS AND

resultsCardiovascular magnetic resonance was performed in 400 asymptomatic hypertensive patients. The newly derived RI (EDV3t, where EDV is LV end-diastolic volume and t is the maximal wall thickness across 16 myocardial segments) stratified hypertensive patients: no LVH, LVH with normal RI (LVHNormal-RI), and LVH with low RI (LVHLow-RI). The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, acute coronary syndromes, strokes, and decompensated heart failure. LVHLow-RI was associated with increased LV mass index, fibrosis burden, impaired myocardial function and elevated biochemical markers of myocardial injury (high-sensitive cardiac troponin I), and wall stress. Over 18.3 ± 7.0 months (601.3 patient-years), 14 adverse events occurred (2.2 events/100 patient-years). Patients with LVHLow-RI had more than a five-fold increase in adverse events compared to those with LVHNormal-RI (11.6 events/100 patient-years vs. 2.0 events/100 patient-years, respectively; log-rank P < 0.001). The RI provided incremental prognostic value over and above a model consisting of clinical variables, LVH and concentricity; and predicted adverse events independent of clinical variables, LVH, and other prognostic markers. Concentric and eccentric LVH were associated with adverse prognosis (log-rank P = 0.62) that was similar to the natural history of hypertensive LVH (5.1 events/100 patient-years).

conclusionThe RI provides prognostic value that improves risk stratification of hypertensive LVH.

Indexed as

HypertensionHypertrophy, Left VentricularEchocardiographyHeart VentriclesHumansVentricular Remodelingcardiac remodellingcardiovascular magnetic resonancehypertensive heart diseaseleft ventricular hypertrophy

Identifiers

PMID32255186
PMCPMC8110315
OpenAlexW2999616609

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.