Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32258160›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2020

Role of Wnt/

Shengli Yuan, Fengying Tao, Xinglin Zhang, Yan Zhang, Xingxing Sun, Dapeng Wu

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shengli YuanDepartment of Oncology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao 266011, China.
Fengying TaoDepartment of Oncology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao 266011, China.
Xinglin ZhangDepartment of Oncology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao 266011, China.
Yan ZhangDepartment of Oncology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao 266011, China.
Xingxing SunDepartment of Oncology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai 200233, China.
Dapeng WuDepartment of Oncology, Qingdao Municipal Hospital, Qingdao 266011, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9446-8365
Qingdao University · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common malignancy with high morbidity and mortality worldwide. To date, chemotherapy plays an important role in the treatment of CRC patients. Multidrug resistance (MDR) is one of the major hurdles in chemotherapy for CRC, and the underlying mechanisms need to be explored. Studies have demonstrated that Wnt/

Indexed as

beta CateninDrug Resistance, NeoplasmNeoplasm ProteinsWnt Signaling PathwayAntineoplastic AgentsColorectal NeoplasmsHumansAntineoplastic Agentsbeta CateninNeoplasm Proteins

Identifiers

PMID32258160
PMCPMC7109575
OpenAlexW3012199016

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.