Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32258997›Full record

ArticleCurrent developments in nutrition2020

Process Evaluation Tool Development and Fidelity of Healthy Retail Interventions in American Indian Tribally Owned Convenience Stores: the Tribal Health Resilience in Vulnerable Environments (THRIVE) Study.

Tori E Taniguchi, Alicia L Salvatore, Mary B Williams, Charlotte V Love, Carolyn J Noonan, Tamela K Cannady, Joy Standridge, Jill Fox, Jennifer Spiegel, JoAnna Owens and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current developments in nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Tori E TaniguchiCenter for Indigenous Health Research and Policy, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Alicia L SalvatoreDepartment of Health Promotion Sciences, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center College of Public Health, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4559-2444
Mary B WilliamsDepartment of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center College of Public Health, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5068-9227
Charlotte V LoveCenter for Indigenous Health Research and Policy, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Carolyn J NoonanInitiative for Research and Education to Advance Community Health, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
Tamela K CannadyChoctaw Nation of Oklahoma Health Services Authority, Durant, OK, USA.
Joy StandridgeChickasaw Nation Nutrition Services Department, Purcell, OK, USA.
Jill FoxChickasaw Nation Nutrition Services Department, Purcell, OK, USA.
Jennifer SpiegelChickasaw Nation Nutrition Services Department, Purcell, OK, USA.
JoAnna OwensChickasaw Nation Nutrition Services Department, Purcell, OK, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1043-7890
Mandy GrammarChoctaw Nation of Oklahoma Health Services Authority, Durant, OK, USA.
AnDina WileyChickasaw Nation Nutrition Services Department, Purcell, OK, USA.
Valarie Blue Bird JerniganCenter for Indigenous Health Research and Policy, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, USA.

Funding

Tribal Health and Resilience in Vulnerable Environment (Thrive) StudyR01HL117729 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI JERNIGAN, VALARIE BLUE BIRD · 2013 to 2017
$3.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL117729
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Tribal Health Resilience in Vulnerable Environments (THRIVE) study aimed to increase healthy food access in 2 rural American Indian communities. The intervention sought to increase fruit and vegetable availability, variety, and convenience through placement, promotion, and pricing of healthy foods and beverages in tribal convenience stores.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to describe the development and implementation of the study process evaluation tool to assess intervention fidelity as part of this cluster-controlled trial.

methodsEight stores (2 intervention and 2 control stores per Nation) participated in the study, implemented from May 2016 to May 2017. A web-based survey tailored to store layouts and intervention components assessed how often intervention items were available, approximate quantity available, and whether placement of healthier food items and promotional materials were implemented as designed. After pilot testing the survey, tribal staff members implemented it to collect process evaluation data in the 8 stores during a period of 9-12 mo, assessing study implementation and potential changes in control stores.

resultsPromotional materials were available ≥75% of the time for most intervention locations. Fruit availability was similar in Nation A and Nation B intervention stores (79-100% compared with 70-100%), whereas fresh vegetable availability was higher in Nation B compared with Nation A (95-96% compared with 55-75%). Both control stores in Nation A and 1 control store in Nation B had moderate fruit and vegetable availability, ranging from 45% to 52%. No control stores in either Nation used intervention promotional materials.

conclusionsProcess evaluation data indicate that the study was implemented with moderate to high fidelity. The development and implementation of the tool can inform future healthy retail interventions that aim to improve rural and tribal food environments.

Indexed as

American Indiansfood environmenthealthy retail interventionobesityprocess evaluationtribal convenience store

Identifiers

PMID32258997
PMCPMC7101486

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.