Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32259065›Full record

ReviewACS pharmacology & translational science2019

Lymphatic Function and Dysfunction in the Context of Sex Differences.

Claire E Trincot, Kathleen M Caron

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS pharmacology & translational science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Regional and Sex-Dependent Immune Profiling Across the Colon in A Mouse Model of Ulcerative Colitis.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Understanding the Lymphatic System: Tissue-on-Chip Modeling.Annual review of biomedical engineering · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Claire E TrincotDepartment of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, 111 Mason Farm Road, 6312B Medical Biomolecular Research Building, CB#7545, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7545, United States.
Kathleen M CaronDepartment of Cell Biology and Physiology, University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, 111 Mason Farm Road, 6312B Medical Biomolecular Research Building, CB#7545, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7545, United States.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Cardiac Lymphatics in Heart FailureR01HL129086 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CARON, KATHLEEN M · 2016 to 2023
$4.1M
GPCR-mediated pathways for regulation of intestinal lymphatic functionR01DK119145 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CARON, KATHLEEN M · 2019 to 2023
$2.6M
Causes and Consequences of Digestive Tract LymphangiectasiaR01DK099156 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CARON, KATHLEEN M · 2013 to 2016
$1.3M
American Heart Association-American Stroke Association 15PRE25680001NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL129086NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK099156NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK119145
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endothelial cells are the building blocks of the blood vascular system and exhibit well-characterized sexually dimorphic phenotypes with regard to chromosomal and hormonal sex, imparting innate genetic and physiological differences between male and female vascular systems and cardiovascular disease. However, even though females are predominantly affected by disorders of lymphatic vascular function, we lack a comprehensive understanding of the effects of sex and sex hormones on lymphatic growth, function, and dysfunction. Here, we attempt to comprehensively evaluate the current understanding of sex as a biological variable influencing lymphatic biology. We first focus on elucidating innate and fundamental differences between the sexes in lymphatic function and development. Next, we delve into lymphatic disease and explore the potential underpinnings toward bias prevalence in the female population. Lastly, we incorporate more broadly the role of the lymphatic system in sex-biased diseases such as cancer, cardiovascular disease, reproductive disorders, and autoimmune diseases to explore whether and how sex differences may influence lymphatic function in the context of these pathologies.

Identifiers

PMID32259065
PMCPMC7089000
OpenAlexW2972490899

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.