Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32260447›Full record

ReviewBiomolecules2020

The Status of p53 Oligomeric and Aggregation States in Cancer.

Guilherme A P de Oliveira, Elaine C Petronilho, Murilo M Pedrote, Mayra A Marques, Tuane C R G Vieira, Elio A Cino, Jerson L Silva

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomolecules, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. p53: The Multifaceted Roles of Covalent Modifications in Cancer.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Big versus small: The impact of aggregate size in disease.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Guilherme A P de OliveiraInstitute of Medical Biochemistry Leopoldo de Meis, National Institute of Science and Technology for Structural Biology and Bioimaging, National Center of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Jiri Jonas, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, RJ 21941-901 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Elaine C PetronilhoInstitute of Medical Biochemistry Leopoldo de Meis, National Institute of Science and Technology for Structural Biology and Bioimaging, National Center of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Jiri Jonas, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, RJ 21941-901 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Murilo M PedroteInstitute of Medical Biochemistry Leopoldo de Meis, National Institute of Science and Technology for Structural Biology and Bioimaging, National Center of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Jiri Jonas, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, RJ 21941-901 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Mayra A MarquesInstitute of Medical Biochemistry Leopoldo de Meis, National Institute of Science and Technology for Structural Biology and Bioimaging, National Center of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Jiri Jonas, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, RJ 21941-901 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Tuane C R G VieiraInstitute of Medical Biochemistry Leopoldo de Meis, National Institute of Science and Technology for Structural Biology and Bioimaging, National Center of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Jiri Jonas, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, RJ 21941-901 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Elio A CinoDepartment of Biochemistry and Immunology, Federal University of Minas Gerais, MG 31270-901 Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Jerson L SilvaInstitute of Medical Biochemistry Leopoldo de Meis, National Institute of Science and Technology for Structural Biology and Bioimaging, National Center of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Jiri Jonas, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, RJ 21941-901 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 465395/2014-7Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro 210008/2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite being referred to as the guardian of the genome, when impacted by mutations, p53 can lose its protective functions and become a renegade. The malignant transformation of p53 occurs on multiple levels, such as altered DNA binding properties, acquisition of novel cellular partners, or associating into different oligomeric states. The consequences of these transformations can be catastrophic. Ongoing studies have implicated different oligomeric p53 species as having a central role in cancer biology; however, the correlation between p53 oligomerization status and oncogenic activities in cancer progression remains an open conundrum. In this review, we summarize the roles of different p53 oligomeric states in cancer and discuss potential research directions for overcoming aberrant p53 function associated with them. We address how misfolding and prion-like amyloid aggregation of p53 seem to play a crucial role in cancer development. The misfolded and aggregated states of mutant p53 are prospective targets for the development of novel therapeutic strategies against tumoral diseases.

Indexed as

Protein AggregatesProtein MultimerizationAnimalsHumansNeoplasmsProtein Structure, QuaternaryTumor Suppressor Protein p53Protein AggregatesTumor Suppressor Protein p53gain-of-function effectsmutant p53oncogenesisp53 aggregationp53 oligomers

Identifiers

PMID32260447
PMCPMC7226498
OpenAlexW3014407748

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.