ReviewHuman genetics2020
Human genetics of Buruli ulcer.
Review in Human genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Targeting Autophagy as a Strategy for Developing New Host-Directed Therapeutics Against Nontuberculous Mycobacteria.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The monogenic landscape of human infectious diseases.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2025Review
- A Review on the Epidemiology and Clinical Management of Neglected Tropical Diseases.Infectious disorders drug targets · 2025Review
- Autophagy and Host Defense in Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Infection.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Review
- The human genetic determinism of life-threatening infectious diseases: genetic heterogeneity and physiological homogeneity?Human genetics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Buruli ulcer, the third most common mycobacterial disease worldwide, is caused by Mycobacterium ulcerans and characterized by devastating necrotizing skin lesions. Susceptibility to Buruli ulcer is thought to depend on host genetics, but very few genetic studies have been performed. The identification of a microdeletion on chromosome 8 in a familial form of severe Buruli ulcer suggested a monogenic basis of susceptibility. The role of common host genetic variants in Buruli ulcer development has been investigated in only three candidate-gene studies targeting genes involved in mycobacterial diseases. A recent genome-wide association study suggested a probable role for long non-coding RNAs and strengthened the contribution of autophagy as a major defense mechanism against mycobacteria. In this review, we summarize the history, epidemiological and clinical aspects of Buruli ulcer, focusing particularly on genetic findings relating to susceptibility to this disease. Finally, we discuss exciting new genetic avenues arising, in particular, from studies of mouse models, and the need for different disciplines to work together, to benefit from the extensive work on other mycobacterial diseases, mostly tuberculosis and leprosy. We are convinced that such pooling of effort will lead to the development of efficient novel strategies for combatting Buruli ulcer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.