ReviewJournal of animal science2020
Current status of genomic evaluation.
Review in Journal of animal science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
77 citing papers in PubMed.
- Heritability of behavioral traits and their genetic correlations with carcass traits in beef cattle.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026Article
- Genomic selection and association analyses for improving semen traits in Thai native roosters.Poultry science · 2026Article
- Genetic parameters and genome-wide association analysis of service sire effects on litter size and its relationship with boar semen quality in three terminal sire lines.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026Article
- Weighted Single-Step Genomic Evaluation of Body Structural Traits for Early Selection of Growth Performance in Thai Swamp Buffalo.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Genomic Prediction and Genome-Wide Association Analysis of Egg Fertility and Hatchability Traits in Thai Native Grandparent Stock.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Impact of Model Parameterisation and Variance Component Estimates on Genomic Predictions of Carcass Traits in Montana Composite Cattle.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2026Article
- Genomic selection accuracy and bias using imputed genotypes on growth, welfare and fitness traits in two Pekin duck lines.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Towards a sweetpotato genomic-enabled breeding: optimizing two-stage analysis of multi-environment augmented trials.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Article
- A comprehensive genomic characterization of Nellore cattle.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Evaluating Adjusted ssGBLUP Models for Genomic Prediction and Matrix Compatibility in South African Holstein Cattle.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- SNPs with High Linkage Disequilibrium Increase the Explained Genetic Variance and the Reliability of Genomic Predictions.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Opportunities and computational challenges in large-scale whole-genome sequencing data analysis.Journal of animal science · 2026Review
- Using predictivity to estimate heritabilities and genetic correlations over time for growth traits in a large genotyped angus cattle population.Journal of animal science · 2026Article
- Article
- Genomic analysis for cattle breeding improvement, progress and future perspectives in Peru: a review.Animal biotechnology · 2025Review
- Genetic Evaluation of Milk Production Traits in the Serbian Saanen Goat Population.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Efficiency of Recurrent Genomic Selection in Panmictic Populations.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Preliminary Evaluation of Blending, Tuning, and Scaling Parameters in ssGBLUP for Genomic Prediction Accuracy in South African Holstein Cattle.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Assessing the Impact of Different Mixing Strategies on Genomic Prediction Accuracy for Beef Cattle Breeding Values in Multi-Breed Genomic Prediction.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Candidate Genes, Markers, Signatures of Selection, and Quantitative Trait Loci (QTLs) and Their Association with Economic Traits in Livestock: Genomic Insights and Selection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early application of genomic selection relied on SNP estimation with phenotypes or de-regressed proofs (DRP). Chips of 50k SNP seemed sufficient for an accurate estimation of SNP effects. Genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) were composed of an index with parent average, direct genomic value, and deduction of a parental index to eliminate double counting. Use of SNP selection or weighting increased accuracy with small data sets but had minimal to no impact with large data sets. Efforts to include potentially causative SNP derived from sequence data or high-density chips showed limited or no gain in accuracy. After the implementation of genomic selection, EBV by BLUP became biased because of genomic preselection and DRP computed based on EBV required adjustments, and the creation of DRP for females is hard and subject to double counting. Genomic selection was greatly simplified by single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP). This method based on combining genomic and pedigree relationships automatically creates an index with all sources of information, can use any combination of male and female genotypes, and accounts for preselection. To avoid biases, especially under strong selection, ssGBLUP requires that pedigree and genomic relationships are compatible. Because the inversion of the genomic relationship matrix (G) becomes costly with more than 100k genotyped animals, large data computations in ssGBLUP were solved by exploiting limited dimensionality of genomic data due to limited effective population size. With such dimensionality ranging from 4k in chickens to about 15k in cattle, the inverse of G can be created directly (e.g., by the algorithm for proven and young) at a linear cost. Due to its simplicity and accuracy, ssGBLUP is routinely used for genomic selection by the major chicken, pig, and beef industries. Single step can be used to derive SNP effects for indirect prediction and for genome-wide association studies, including computations of the P-values. Alternative single-step formulations exist that use SNP effects for genotyped or for all animals. Although genomics is the new standard in breeding and genetics, there are still some problems that need to be solved. This involves new validation procedures that are unaffected by selection, parameter estimation that accounts for all the genomic data used in selection, and strategies to address reduction in genetic variances after genomic selection was implemented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.