Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32270544›Full record

Trial reportAddiction (Abingdon, England)2020

Impact of bottle size on in-home consumption of wine: a randomized controlled cross-over trial.

Saphsa Codling, Eleni Mantzari, Olivia Sexton, Georgia Fuller, Rachel Pechey, Gareth J Hollands, Mark Pilling, Theresa M Marteau

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Saphsa CodlingBehaviour and Health Research Unit, University of Cambridge, UK.
Eleni MantzariBehaviour and Health Research Unit, University of Cambridge, UK.
Olivia SextonBehaviour and Health Research Unit, University of Cambridge, UK.
Georgia FullerBehaviour and Health Research Unit, University of Cambridge, UK.
Rachel PecheyBehaviour and Health Research Unit, University of Cambridge, UK.
Gareth J HollandsBehaviour and Health Research Unit, University of Cambridge, UK.
Mark PillingBehaviour and Health Research Unit, University of Cambridge, UK.
Theresa M MarteauBehaviour and Health Research Unit, University of Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3025-1129

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 206853/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo assess the impact of purchasing wine in 50 cl bottles compared with 75 cl bottles on the amount of wine consumed at home.

designCross-over randomized controlled trial with a 'usual behaviour' period of a maximum of 3 weeks between conditions.

settingHouseholds in the United Kingdom.

participantsOne hundred and eighty-six households that consumed between two and eight 75 cl bottles of wine each week.

interventionHouseholds were randomized to the order in which they purchased wine in two bottle sizes. During two 14-day intervention periods, households purchased a pre-set volume of wine-based on their baseline self-reported weekly consumption-in either 75 cl bottles or 50 cl bottles. On days 7 and 14 of each study period, participating households sent photographs of each purchased wine bottle. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was the volume of study wine in millilitres (ml) consumed during each study period estimated through returned photographs. The secondary outcome was the rate of consumption measured by the mean number of days taken to drink 1.5 litres from each bottle size.

findingsOne hundred and sixty-six of 186 enrolled households satisfactorily completed the study. After accounting for pre-specified covariates, 191.1 ml [95% confidence interval (CI) = 42.03-339.2] or 4.5% (95% CI = 1.0-7.9%) more wine was consumed per 14-day period from 75-cl bottles than from 50-cl bottles. Consumption was 5.8% faster (95% CI = -10.9 to -0.4%) from 75 cl bottles than from 50 cl bottles.

conclusionsConsuming wine at home from 50 cl bottles, compared with 75 cl bottles, may reduce both amount consumed and rate of consumption.

Indexed as

AdultAlcohol DrinkingConsumer BehaviorCross-Over StudiesFamily CharacteristicsFemaleFood PackagingHumansMaleMiddle AgedSelf ReportUnited KingdomWineAlcoholbottle sizeconsumptioncross-overportion sizerandomized trialRCTwine

Identifiers

PMID32270544
PMCPMC8190654

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.