Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32277451›Full record

ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2020

Biolistic Approach for Transient Gene Expression Studies in Plants.

Benoît Lacroix, Vitaly Citovsky

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. RNAi and genome editing of sugarcane: Progress and prospects.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Advances in Soybean Genetic Improvement.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Biotechnological Advances to Improve Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Crops.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Benoît LacroixDepartment of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY, USA. benoit.lacroix@stonybrook.edu.
Vitaly CitovskyDepartment of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, State University of New York, Stony Brook, NY, USA.

Funding

TRANSPORT THROUGH PLASMODESMATAR01GM050224 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI CITOVSKY, VITALY H · 1994 to 2020
$5.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM050224
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since its inception in the late 1980s, the delivery of exogenous nucleic acids into living cells via high-velocity microprojectiles (biolistic, or microparticle bombardment) has been an invaluable tool for both agricultural and fundamental plant research. Here, we review the technical aspects and the major applications of the biolistic method for studies involving transient gene expression in plant cells. These studies cover multiple areas of plant research, including gene expression, protein subcellular localization and cell-to-cell movement, plant virology, silencing, and the more recently developed targeted genome editing via transient expression of customized endonucleases.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, PlantBiolisticsGene EditingPlantsPromoter Regions, GeneticTransgenesBiolisticMicrobombardmentMicroparticle bombardmentNucleic acid deliveryTransient gene expression

Identifiers

PMID32277451
PMCPMC7217558

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.