Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32285257›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2020

Harvest of at least 18 lymph nodes is associated with improved survival in patients with pN0 colon cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Fei-Long Ning, Jun-Peng Pei, Nan-Nan Zhang, Jun Wang, Hong-Guang Quan, Zu-Bing Mei, Xian-Tao Zeng, Masanobu Abe, Chun-Dong Zhang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Radiomics analysis of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Fei-Long Ning *Department of General Surgery, Xuzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Xuzhou, People's Republic of China.
Jun-Peng PeiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, People's Republic of China.
Nan-Nan Zhang *State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, Institute of Digestive Diseases, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, People's Republic of China.
Jun WangDepartment of General Surgery, Xuzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Xuzhou, People's Republic of China.
Hong-Guang QuanDepartment of General Surgery, Xuzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Xuzhou, People's Republic of China.
Zu-Bing MeiDepartment of Anorectal Surgery, Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Xian-Tao ZengCenter for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Masanobu AbeDivision for Health Service Promotion, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Chun-Dong ZhangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, People's Republic of China. zhangchundong2007@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1804-1356
Fourth Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University · CNShanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNUniversity of Tokyo Health Sciences · JPWuhan University · CNXijing Hospital · CN

Funding

China Scholarship Council 201908050148Japan China Sasakawa Medical Fellowship 2017816National Natural Science Foundation of China 81774112
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the correlation between number of retrieved lymph nodes (rLNs) and prognosis and further ascertain the optimal number of rLNs with a beneficial survival impact in patients with pN0 colon cancer.

methodsThe Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was searched for pN0 colon cancer cases. X-Tile software and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were applied to determine the optimal number of rLNs based on the minimal probability (P) value and the largest χ

resultsA total of 6269 pN0 colon cancer patients who underwent surgical therapy were finally included for analysis. Harvest of at least 18 lymph nodes was determined as the optimal rLN number. This cut-off rLN value (< 18 versus ≥ 18) was identified as an independent prognostic factor (P < 0.001) of overall survival via multivariate analysis. Similar findings were obtained in patients with retrieval of at least 12 lymph nodes (18 > rLNs ≥ 12 versus rLNs ≥ 18) stratified into several groups.

conclusionsThe number of rLNs was identified as an independent prognostic factor for pN0 colon cancer. Retrieval of at least 18 lymph nodes was associated with favorable prognosis in patients with pN0 colon cancer, and should, therefore, be regarded as an alternative cut-off value for survival analysis.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedCohort StudiesColonic NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesSEER ProgramUnited StatesYoung AdultAJCC/UICCColon cancerpN0 patientsRetrieved lymph nodesSEER

Identifiers

PMID32285257
PMCPMC11804418
OpenAlexW3015269437

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.