Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32286604›Full record

ArticleBioscience reports2020

Immunohistochemical staining reveals differential expression of ACSL3 and ACSL4 in hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatic gastrointestinal metastases.

Haarith Ndiaye, Jorlin Y Liu, Andrew Hall, Shane Minogue, Marsha Y Morgan, Mark G Waugh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioscience reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Haarith NdiayeUCL Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, Division of Medicine, Royal Free Campus, University College London, London NW3 2PF, U.K.
Jorlin Y LiuUCL Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, Division of Medicine, Royal Free Campus, University College London, London NW3 2PF, U.K.
Andrew HallUCL Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, Division of Medicine, Royal Free Campus, University College London, London NW3 2PF, U.K.
Shane MinogueUCL Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, Division of Medicine, Royal Free Campus, University College London, London NW3 2PF, U.K.
Marsha Y MorganUCL Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, Division of Medicine, Royal Free Campus, University College London, London NW3 2PF, U.K.
Mark G WaughUCL Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, Division of Medicine, Royal Free Campus, University College London, London NW3 2PF, U.K.
Roland Hill (United Kingdom) · GBRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust · GBThe Royal Free Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-chain fatty acyl CoA synthetases (ACSLs) activate fatty acids by CoA addition thus facilitating their intracellular metabolism. Dysregulated ACSL expression features in several cancers and can affect processes such as ferroptosis, fatty acid β-oxidation, prostaglandin biosynthesis, steroidogenesis and phospholipid acyl chain remodelling. Here we investigate long chain acyl-CoA synthetase 3 (ACSL3) and long chain acyl-CoA synthetase 4 (ACSL4) expression in liver malignancies. The expression and subcellular localisations of the ACSL3 and ACSL4 isoforms in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and hepatic metastases were assessed by immunohistochemical analyses of multiple tumour tissue arrays and by subcellular fractionation of cultured HepG2 cells. The expression of both enzymes was increased in HCC compared with normal liver. Expression of ACSL3 was similar in HCC and hepatic metastases but lower in healthy tissue. Increased ACSL3 expression distinguished HCC from CCA with a sensitivity of 87.2% and a specificity of 75%. ACSL4 expression was significantly greater in HCC than in all other tumours and distinguished HCC from normal liver tissue with a sensitivity of 93.8% and specificity of 93.6%. Combined ACSL3 and ACSL4 staining scores distinguished HCC from hepatic metastases with 80.1% sensitivity and 77.1% specificity. These enzymes had partially overlapping intracellular distributions, ACSL4 localised to the plasma membrane and both isoforms associated with lipid droplets and the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). In conclusion, analysis of ACSL3 and ACSL4 expression can distinguish different classes of hepatic tumours.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, HepatocellularCell MembraneCoenzyme A LigasesDiagnosis, DifferentialEndoplasmic ReticulumFemaleGastrointestinal NeoplasmsHep G2 CellsHumansImmunohistochemistryLipid DropletsBiomarkers, TumorCoenzyme A LigasesLong-Chain-Fatty-Acid-CoA Ligasefatty acid oxidationhepatocellular carcinomalipid dropletslipid metabolism

Identifiers

PMID32286604
PMCPMC7198044
OpenAlexW3016086238

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.