Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32298256›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2020

Portable sequencing as a teaching tool in conservation and biodiversity research.

Mrinalini Watsa, Gideon A Erkenswick, Aaron Pomerantz, Stefan Prost

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A new species ofIMA fungus · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Real-time genomics for One Health.Molecular systems biology · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mrinalini WatsaField Projects International, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8130-8810
Gideon A ErkenswickField Projects International, Saint Louis, Missouri, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6040-1170
Aaron PomerantzDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6412-9001
Stefan ProstLOEWE-Centre for Translational Biodiversity Genomics, Senckenberg, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6229-3596

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As biodiversity loss continues to accelerate, there is a critical need for education and biomonitoring across the globe. Portable technologies allow for in situ molecular biodiversity monitoring that has been historically out of reach for many researchers in habitat nations. In the realm of education, portable tools such as DNA sequencers facilitate in situ hands-on training in real-time sequencing and interpretation techniques. Here, we provide step-by-step protocols as a blueprint for a terrestrial conservation genetics field training program that uses low-cost, portable devices to conduct genomics-based training directly in biodiverse habitat countries.

Indexed as

BiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicEcosystemFemaleGeneticsHumansMalePeruPolymerase Chain Reaction

Identifiers

PMID32298256
PMCPMC7188297

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.