ArticleJournal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls2020
Mission (im)possible: Engaging care homes, staff and residents in research studies.
Article in Journal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Pilot Randomised Clinical Trial of a Novel Approach to Reduce Sedentary Behaviour in Care Home Residents: Feasibility and Preliminary Effects of the GET READY Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Trial
- Integrating Virtual Reality Simulation, Online Learning, and Group Reflection to Strengthen Dementia Care in Nursing Homes: Mixed Methods Pilot Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Determining the Key Education Priorities Related to Heart Failure Care in Nursing Homes: A Modified Delphi Approach.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Prevalence of urinary incontinence and associated factors in nursing homes: a multicentre cross-sectional study.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- Identifying barriers and facilitators to the inclusion of older adults living in UK care homes in research: a scoping review.BMC geriatrics · 2023Article
- Effectiveness of Interventions for Reducing Sedentary Behaviour in Older Adults Living in Long-Term Care Facilities: A Protocol for a Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Why the trial researcher matters: Day-to-day work viewed through the lens of normalization process theory.SSM. Qualitative research in health · 2023Article
- Teaming up to traverse loneliness: a co-creative journey toward a home care work model for supporting social participation among older adults.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Survival and outcomes for stroke survivors living in care homes: a prospective cohort study.Age and ageing · 2021Article
- Reflexive case studies on conducting technology implementation research in long-term care homes.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesWith increasing age the risk of institutionalization increases. To address the problem of underrepresentation of care homes and their residents in future research studies, we aimed to explore care home staff members' thoughts on barriers, challenges, facilitators and key aspects of engaging in research studies.
methodsFive staff members from four care homes in Glasgow and Barcelona were interviewed. Transcription of the interviews was completed verbatim and an inductive thematic analysis was conducted to understand the difficulties and challenges they perceive for engaging in research studies.
resultsThree themes emerged that encapsulated the staff members' perspectives.
conclusionsDespite the small sample size, the perspectives of staff members, irrespective of country, provided valuable insights for informing researchers on best approaches to maximize care home and resident engagement in research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.