Evidence mapPaperPMID 32308452Full record

ArticleDiabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy2020

Basal Insulin Initiation and Maintenance in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in the United States.

Samaneh Kalirai, Jasmina I Ivanova, Magaly Perez-Nieves, Judith J Stephenson, Irene Hadjiyianni, Michael Grabner, Roy Daniel Pollom, Caroline Geremakis, Beverly L Reed, Lawrence Fisher

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Samaneh KaliraiEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Jasmina I IvanovaAnalysis Group Inc., New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4028-9676
Magaly Perez-NievesEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6264-1095
Judith J StephensonHealthCore Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2747-935X
Irene HadjiyianniEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1472-9017
Michael GrabnerHealthCore Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6521-1007
Roy Daniel PollomEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Caroline GeremakisHealthCore Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA.
Beverly L ReedEli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Lawrence FisherDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, UC San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9481-9727
Eli Lilly (United States) · USWilmington University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveA survey of US adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus was conducted to better understand patients' insulin initiation experiences and treatment persistence behaviors. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsParticipants were recruited from consumer panels and grouped by basal insulin treatment pattern: continuers (no gap of ≥7 days within 6 months of initiation); interrupters (gap ≥7 days, resumed treatment); discontinuers (stopped for ≥7 days, not resumed). A quota of approximately 50 respondents per persistence category was set.

resultsA total of 154 respondents (52 continuers, 52 interrupters, 50 discontinuers) completed the survey. Mean age was 51.4 years; 51.9% male. Continuers were more likely to report their views being considered during initiation, and less likely to report a sense of failure. Concerns included insulin dependence (64.3% agree/strongly agree), frequent blood glucose monitoring (55.2%), costs/ability to pay (53.9%), fears of or mistakes during self-injection (52.6%), and weight gain (52.6%). Continuers were motivated by benefits of insulin therapy; experienced or potential side effects were notable factors for interruption/discontinuation. Healthcare provider instruction was indicated as a reason for continuing, stopping, and restarting therapy.

conclusionBenefits of basal insulin therapy motivated continuers while side effects impacted interruption/discontinuation. Persistence on basal insulin is often influenced by provider actions. Earlier provider intervention upon signs of treatment discontinuation may promote persistence.

Indexed as

basal insulinmedication persistencepatient surveytype 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID32308452
PMCPMC7140903
OpenAlexW3014610519

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.