Evidence mapPaperPMID 32323222Full record

ReviewDrugs2020

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Posaconazole.

Lu Chen, Elke H J Krekels, Paul E Verweij, Jochem B Buil, Catherijne A J Knibbe, Roger J M Brüggemann

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 166 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Emerging Applications of Triazole Antifungal Drugs.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  12. Urinary tract infection caused by rare yeastFrontiers in immunology · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lu ChenDivision of Systems Biomedicine and Pharmacology, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9347-291X
Elke H J KrekelsDivision of Systems Biomedicine and Pharmacology, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6006-1567
Paul E VerweijCenter of Expertise in Mycology Radboudumc/CWZ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8600-9860
Jochem B BuilCenter of Expertise in Mycology Radboudumc/CWZ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4031-0778
Catherijne A J KnibbeDivision of Systems Biomedicine and Pharmacology, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9893-4415
Roger J M BrüggemannCenter of Expertise in Mycology Radboudumc/CWZ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Roger.Bruggemann@radboudumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7618-725X
Leiden University · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Posaconazole is typically used for preventing invasive yeast and mold infections such as invasive aspergillosis in high-risk immunocompromised patients. The oral suspension was the first released formulation and many pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies of this formulation have been published. Erratic absorption profiles associated with this formulation were widely reported. Posaconazole exposure was found to be significantly influenced by food and many gastrointestinal conditions, including pH and motility. As a result, low posaconazole plasma concentrations were obtained in large groups of patients. These issues of erratic absorption urged the development of the subsequently marketed delayed-release tablet, which proved to be associated with higher and more stable exposure profiles. Shortly thereafter, an intravenous formulation was released for patients who are not able to take oral formulations. Both new formulations require a loading dose on day 1 to achieve high posaconazole concentrations more quickly, which was not possible with the oral suspension. So far, there appears to be no evidence of increased toxicity correlated to the higher posaconazole exposure achieved with the regimen for these formulations. The higher systemic availability of posaconazole for the delayed-release tablet and intravenous formulation have resulted in these two formulations being preferable for both prophylaxis and treatment of invasive fungal disease. This review aimed to integrate the current knowledge on posaconazole pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, major toxicity, existing resistance, clinical experience in special populations, and new therapeutic strategies in order to get a clear understanding of the clinical use of this drug.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAnimalsAntifungal AgentsAspergillosisDrug CompoundingHumansInjections, IntravenousTriazolesAntifungal AgentsposaconazoleTriazoles

Identifiers

PMID32323222
PMCPMC7183491
OpenAlexW3019529976

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.