ArticleInternational journal of molecular medicine2020
A novel microRNA signature for pathological grading in lung adenocarcinoma based on TCGA and GEO data.
Article in International journal of molecular medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Candidate Biomarkers Associated With Circulating Tumor Cell Status in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2025Article
- ESOMIR: a curated database of biomarker genes and miRNAs associated with esophageal cancer.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2023Article
- MOCSS: Multi-omics data clustering and cancer subtyping via shared and specific representation learning.iScience · 2023Article
- Machine learning combining multi-omics data and network algorithms identifies adrenocortical carcinoma prognostic biomarkers.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023Article
- Article
- Machine-Learning-Based Late Fusion on Multi-Omics and Multi-Scale Data for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Diagnosis.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Identification of a 7-miRNA signature for predicting the prognosis of patients with lung adenocarcinoma.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Development and Validation of Lactate Metabolism-Related lncRNA Signature as a Prognostic Model for Lung Adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Article
- A narrative review of artificial intelligence-assisted histopathologic diagnosis and decision-making for non-small cell lung cancer: achievements and limitations.Journal of thoracic disease · 2021Review
- An 11-Gene Signature Risk-Prediction Model Based on Prognosis-Related miRNAs and Their Target Genes in Lung Adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- A novel microRNA-based signature predicts prognosis among nasopharyngeal cancer patients.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2021Article
- SARS-CoV-2 may regulate cellular responses through depletion of specific host miRNAs.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is one of the most common types of lung cancer and its poor prognosis largely depends on the tumor pathological stage. Critical roles of microRNAs (miRNAs) have been reported in the tumorigenesis and progression of lung cancer. However, whether the differential expression pattern of miRNAs could be used to distinguish early‑stage (stage I) from mid‑late‑stage (stages II‑IV) LUAD tumors is still unclear. In this study, clinical information and miRNA expression profiles of patients with LUAD were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus databases. TCGA‑LUAD (n=470) dataset was used for model training and validation, and the GSE62182 (n=94) and GSE83527 (n=36) datasets were used as external independent test datasets. The diagnostic model was created through miRNA feature selection followed by SVM classifier and was confirmed by 5‑fold cross‑validation. A receiver operating characteristic curve was calculated to evaluate the accuracy and robustness of the model. Using the DX score and LIBSVM tool, a 16‑miRNA signature that could distinguish LUAD pathological stages was identified. The area under the curve rates were 0.62 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.56‑0.67], 0.66 (95% CI: 0.54‑0.76) and 0.63 (95% CI: 0.43‑0.82) in TCGA‑LUAD internal validation dataset, the GSE62182 external validation dataset, and the GSE83527 external validation dataset, respectively. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes and Gene Ontology enrichment analyses suggested that the target genes of the 16‑miRNA signature were mainly involved in metabolic pathways. The present findings demonstrate that a 16‑miRNA signature could serve as a promising diagnostic biomarker for pathological staging in LUAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.