Evidence mapPaperPMID 32327031Full record

ReviewDeutsches Arzteblatt international2020

Intermittent Claudication and Asymptomatic Peripheral Arterial Disease.

Gerhard Rümenapf, Stephan Morbach, Andrej Schmidt, Martin Sigl

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Walking Training of a Vascular Sports Group.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2020
    Article
  10. In Reply.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2020
    Article
  11. More Amputations with Intervention.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2020
    Article
  12. Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Overlooked.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2020
    Article
  13. Spinal Cord Stimulation as Therapy Option.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gerhard RümenapfDepartment of Angiology, Center of Vascular Medicine "Oberrhein" Speyer, Diakonissen-Stiftungs-Krankenhaus, Speyer; Department of Diabetology and Angiology, Marienkrankenhaus, Soest; Department of Angiology, University Hospital Leipzig; Department of Angiology, Department of Medicine 1, University Hospital Mannheim.
Stephan Morbach
Andrej Schmidt
Martin Sigl
University Hospital Leipzig · DEDiakonissenkrankenhaus · DEMarienkrankenhaus Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe conservative treatment of peripheral arterial disease (PAD), as recommended in current guidelines, encompasses measures such as lifestyle modification and risk-factor management. In addition, in patients with vasogenic intermittent claudication (IC), it is recommended that patients first be given drugs to improve perfusion and undergo supervised gait training. Revascularization is not recommended for asymptomatic persons, but it is considered mandatory for patients with critical ischemia. In this article on conservative and revascularizing treatment strategies for IC, we address the following questions: whether all treatment options are available, how effective they are, and whether the reality of treatment for IC in Germany corresponds to what is recommended in the guidelines.

methodsIn 2014, the German Society for Angiology carried out a comprehensive literature search in order to prepare a new version of the S3 guideline on PAD. This literature search was updated up to 2018, with identical methods, for the present review.

resultsThe benefit of lifestyle modification and risk factor treatment is supported by high-level evidence ( evidence level I, recommendation grade A ). The distance patients are able to walk without pain is increased by drug therapy as well (evidence level IIb), but the therapeutic effect is only moderate. Supervised exercise training (SET), though supported by high-level evidence (I, A), is of limited efficacy, availability, and applicability, and patient compliance with it is also limited. In patients with IC, revascularization leads to complete relief of symptoms more rapidly than gait training, and its long-term benefit is steadily improving owing to advances in medical technology. A combination of arterial revascularization and gait training yields the best results. In a clinical trial, patients with IC who underwent combined therapy increased the distance they could walk without pain by 954 m in six months, compared to 407 m in a group that underwent gait training alone.

conclusionIn the treatment of vasogenic IC, SET and drugs to increase perfusion are now giving way to revascularization, which is more effective. As far as can be determined, SET is not currently implemented at all in the German health care system. It would be desirable for SET to be more available and more widely used, both to sustain the benefit of revascularization over the long term and to lower the general cardiovascular risk.

Indexed as

Asymptomatic DiseasesGermanyHumansIntermittent ClaudicationPeripheral Arterial DiseasePractice Guidelines as Topic

Identifiers

PMID32327031
PMCPMC7191120
OpenAlexW3009380556

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.