Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32328239›Full record

Trial reportJournal of nutritional science2020

Obesity indicators that best predict type 2 diabetes in an Indian population: insights from the Kerala Diabetes Prevention Program.

Nitin Kapoor, Mojtaba Lotfaliany, Thirunavukkarasu Sathish, K R Thankappan, Nihal Thomas, John Furler, Brian Oldenburg, Robyn J Tapp

Abstract readPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of nutritional science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Association Between Anthropometric Indices and Presence of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Obesity.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Barocrinology: The Endocrinology of Obesity from Bench to Bedside.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nitin KapoorDepartment of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Christian Medical College & Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9520-2072
Mojtaba LotfalianyMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Science, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Thirunavukkarasu SathishMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Science, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
K R ThankappanAchutha Menon Centre for Health Science Studies, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.
Nihal ThomasDepartment of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Christian Medical College & Hospital, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
John FurlerDepartment of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Science, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Brian OldenburgMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Science, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Robyn J TappMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Science, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

Building the Asian NCoD Research Network for Regional Research CapacityD43TW008332 · FIC · MONASH UNIVERSITY · PI FISHER, EDWIN B, KADIR, KHALID · 2010 to 2014
$1.0M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW008332
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obesity indicators are known to predict the presence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM); however, evidence for which indicator best identifies undiagnosed T2DM in the Indian population is still very limited. In the present study we examined the utility of different obesity indicators to identify the presence of undiagnosed T2DM and determined their appropriate cut point for each obesity measure. Individuals were recruited from the large-scale population-based Kerala Diabetes Prevention Program. Oral glucose tolerance tests was performed to diagnose T2DM. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were used to compare the association of different obesity indicators with T2DM and to determine the optimal cut points for identifying T2DM. A total of 357 new cases of T2DM and 1352 individuals without diabetes were identified. The mean age of the study participants was 46⋅4 (sd 7⋅4) years and 62 % were men. Waist circumference (WC), waist:hip ratio (WHR), waist:height ratio (WHtR), BMI, body fat percentage and fat per square of height were found to be significantly higher (

Indexed as

AdultDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleGlucose Tolerance TestHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesityROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityWaist CircumferenceWaist-Height RatioWaist-Hip RatioNormal-weight obesityObesity indicatorsROC, receiver operating characteristicsT2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitusThin–fat phenotypeType 2 diabetes mellitusVisceral adiposityWC, waist circumferenceWHR, waist:hip ratioWHtR, waist:height ratio

Identifiers

PMID32328239
PMCPMC7163399

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.