Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32328973›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of hematology2020

Comparison of starting doses of anagrelide as a first-line therapy in patients with cytoreductive therapy-naïve essential thrombocythemia: difference between starting at 0.5 and 1.0 mg/day.

Yoshinori Hashimoto, Tomoki Ito, Yasuhiro Tanaka, Aya Nakaya, Shinya Fujita, Atsushi Satake, Takahisa Nakanishi, Akiko Konishi, Masaaki Hotta, Hideaki Yoshimura and 7 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of hematology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yoshinori HashimotoDepartment of Hematology, Tottori Prefectural Central Hospital, Tottori, Tottori, Japan.
Tomoki ItoFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University, 2-5-1, Shinmachi, Hirakata-City, Osaka, 573-1010, Japan. itot@hirakata.kmu.ac.jp.
Yasuhiro TanakaDepartment of Hematology and Clinical Immunology, Kobe City Nishi-Kobe Medical Center, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Aya NakayaFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University, 2-5-1, Shinmachi, Hirakata-City, Osaka, 573-1010, Japan.
Shinya FujitaFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University, 2-5-1, Shinmachi, Hirakata-City, Osaka, 573-1010, Japan.
Atsushi SatakeFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University, 2-5-1, Shinmachi, Hirakata-City, Osaka, 573-1010, Japan.
Takahisa NakanishiFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University, 2-5-1, Shinmachi, Hirakata-City, Osaka, 573-1010, Japan.
Akiko KonishiFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University, 2-5-1, Shinmachi, Hirakata-City, Osaka, 573-1010, Japan.
Masaaki HottaFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University, 2-5-1, Shinmachi, Hirakata-City, Osaka, 573-1010, Japan.
Hideaki YoshimuraFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University, 2-5-1, Shinmachi, Hirakata-City, Osaka, 573-1010, Japan.
Kazuyoshi IshiiFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University, 2-5-1, Shinmachi, Hirakata-City, Osaka, 573-1010, Japan.
Akiko HashimotoDepartment of Hematology and Clinical Immunology, Kobe City Nishi-Kobe Medical Center, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Toshinori KondoDepartment of Hematology, Kawasaki Medical School, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan.
Hiromi OmuraDepartment of Hematology, Tottori Prefectural Central Hospital, Tottori, Tottori, Japan.
Isaku ShinzatoDepartment of Hematology and Clinical Immunology, Kobe City Nishi-Kobe Medical Center, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Takayuki TanakaDepartment of Hematology, Tottori Prefectural Central Hospital, Tottori, Tottori, Japan.
Shosaku NomuraFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University, 2-5-1, Shinmachi, Hirakata-City, Osaka, 573-1010, Japan.
Kansai Medical University · JPKobe City Nishi-Kobe Medical Center · JPTottori Prefectural Central Hospital · JPKawasaki Medical School · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anagrelide is widely used for cytoreductive therapy in patients with essential thrombocythemia who are at high risk for thrombosis. The recommended starting dose in the package insert of anagrelide varies by country. A high starting dose leads to an early onset of action, but causes a higher incidence of adverse events. This relationship indicates that both the onset of action and side effects of anagrelide are dose dependent. We retrospectively compared the efficacy and safety of anagrelide as a first-line drug between patients with essential thrombocythemia who started at 0.5 or 1.0 mg/day. Incidence of total adverse events and anagrelide-related palpitation, discontinuation rates, and the median daily dose of anagrelide were lower in the 0.5 mg/day group than in the 1.0 mg/day group; however, comparable platelet-lowering effects were achieved in both groups. These data suggest that a low starting dose of anagrelide followed by dose escalation may result in fewer adverse events and lower discontinuation rates, while providing desirable platelet-lowering effects. Initiating anagrelide at a lower dose may be a useful approach in actual clinical practice.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsQuinazolinesRetrospective StudiesSafetyThrombocythemia, EssentialTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultanagrelidePlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsQuinazolinesAnagrelideEssential thrombocythemiaFirst lineStarting dose

Identifiers

PMID32328973
OpenAlexW3020506410

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.