Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32332614›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2020

The short-term efficacy of mud therapy for knee osteoarthritis: A meta-analysis.

Chengzhi Hou, Long Liang, Xuelei Chu, Weikai Qin, Yongyao Li, Yong Zhao

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical efficacy of medical hydrology: an umbrella review.International journal of biometeorology · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Peloids as Thermotherapeutic Agents.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chengzhi HouOrthopedic Department, Wangjing Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences.
Long LiangOrthopedic Department, Wangjing Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences.
Xuelei ChuBeijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Weikai QinOrthopedic Department, Wangjing Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences.
Yongyao LiOrthopedic Department, Wangjing Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences.
Yong ZhaoOrthopedic Department, Wangjing Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences.
China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences · CNBeijing University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this review is to systematically evaluate the short-term efficacy of mud therapy in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA).Randomized controlled trials, in which treatment of KOA is mud therapy, were included by systematically searching the PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases.According to inclusion criteria and searching method, 11 articles, containing a total of 1106 patients, were included in the study. Our results showed significant differences in visual analog scale pain score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (pain, stiffness, function). In addition, the heterogeneity of study included is lower (I < 25%).According to the results of this meta-analysis, mud therapy can effectively alleviate the pain and improve joint function for KOA.

Indexed as

Time FactorsHumansMud TherapyOsteoarthritis, KneeTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID32332614
PMCPMC7220793
OpenAlexW3019357718

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.