Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32336701›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of veterinary medical science2020

Pseudorabies virus (PRV) strain with defects in gE, gC, and TK genes protects piglets against an emerging PRV variant.

Jinxin Lin, Zhaolong Li, Zhihua Feng, Zhou Fang, Jianghua Chen, Wengzhi Chen, Wangwang Liang, Qi Chen

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of veterinary medical science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jinxin LinFujian Key Laboratory of Innate Immune Biology, Fujian Normal University Qishan Campus, 8 Xuefu South Road, Shangjie Town, Minhou County, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China, 350117.
Zhaolong LiInstitute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 100 Pudang Road, Xindian Town, Jin'an District, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China, 350013.
Zhihua FengFujian Key Laboratory of Innate Immune Biology, Fujian Normal University Qishan Campus, 8 Xuefu South Road, Shangjie Town, Minhou County, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China, 350117.
Zhou FangFujian Key Laboratory of Innate Immune Biology, Fujian Normal University Qishan Campus, 8 Xuefu South Road, Shangjie Town, Minhou County, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China, 350117.
Jianghua ChenFujian Key Laboratory of Innate Immune Biology, Fujian Normal University Qishan Campus, 8 Xuefu South Road, Shangjie Town, Minhou County, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China, 350117.
Wengzhi ChenFujian Key Laboratory of Innate Immune Biology, Fujian Normal University Qishan Campus, 8 Xuefu South Road, Shangjie Town, Minhou County, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China, 350117.
Wangwang LiangFujian Key Laboratory of Innate Immune Biology, Fujian Normal University Qishan Campus, 8 Xuefu South Road, Shangjie Town, Minhou County, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China, 350117.
Qi ChenFujian Key Laboratory of Innate Immune Biology, Fujian Normal University Qishan Campus, 8 Xuefu South Road, Shangjie Town, Minhou County, Fuzhou, Fujian Province, China, 350117.
Fujian Normal University · CNFujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevalence of an emerging variant of the pseudorabies virus (PRV) has been causing serious losses to farmers in China. Moreover, the commercially available PRV vaccine often fails to provide thorough protection. Therefore, in this study, we generated a PRV-∆gC\gE∆TK strain with defects in gC, gE, and TK of PRV. Compared to the parental PRV strain and the single gene deletion strains (PRV-∆gC, PRV-∆gE, and PRV-∆TK), PRV-∆gC\gE∆TK grew slowly, and exhibited fewer and smaller plaques on swine testis (ST) cells. Furthermore, animal experiment results showed that mice that were immunized intramuscularly with PRV-∆gC\gE∆TK, survived throughout the experiment with no observed clinical symptoms, and were completely protected against PRV challenge. Additionally, deletion of the gC, gE, and TK genes significantly alleviated viral damage in the brain. Furthermore, one-day-old weaned piglets immunized intramuscularly with PRV-∆gC\gE∆TK elicited higher levels of gB antibodies against both the emerging PRV variant and the parental PRV, exhibited full protection against challenge with both variants, and showed neutralization capacity against PRV. These data suggest that PRV-∆gC\gE∆TK is a promising vaccine candidate for the control of pseudorabies.

Indexed as

AnimalsCRISPR-Cas SystemsGene DeletionGenes, ViralHEK293 CellsHerpesvirus 1, SuidHumansImmunizationInjections, IntramuscularMice, Inbred BALB CPseudorabiesPseudorabies VaccinesSwineSwine DiseasesVaccines, AttenuatedPseudorabies VaccinesVaccines, AttenuatedgC/gE/TK deletionPRV-∆gC\gE∆TKpseudorabies virusvaccine

Identifiers

PMID32336701
PMCPMC7324833
OpenAlexW3017693845

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.