Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32337364›Full record

ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2020

Changes in breath cycle sensing affect outcomes in upper airway stimulation in sleep apnea.

Armin Steffen, J Ulrich Sommer, Kingman Strohl, Katrin Hasselbacher, Maria V Suurna, Benedikt Hofauer, Clemens Heiser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Armin SteffenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology University of Lübeck Lübeck Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1044-492X
J Ulrich SommerHelios University Hospital Wuppertal, University Witten/Herdecke Wuppertal Germany.
Kingman StrohlUniversity Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University Cleveland Ohio.
Katrin HasselbacherDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology University of Lübeck Lübeck Germany.
Maria V SuurnaDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Weill Cornell Medicine New York New York.
Benedikt HofauerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery University of Freiburg Freiburg im Breisgau Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3126-2877
Clemens HeiserDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery Technische Universität München Munich Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6301-2891

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUpper Airway Stimulation (UAS) is a well-established therapy option for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

aimsThere are no data on whether respiratory sensing contributes to successful UAS therapy. MATERIALS &

methodsAfter initial measurements of 3 implanted patients (M1), the sensing signal was inverted (M2) without changing other parameters. Two weeks later, the signal was converted back again, and the sensitivity of breathing cycle detection was turned to a very low state (M3).

resultsAt M2 and M3, the apnea-hypopnea index and oxygen desaturation index increased. DISCUSSION: Correct respiratory sensing is important for controlling OSA using UAS.

conclusionsTherefore, implant centers should should optimize respiratory sensing placement and adjustment.

Indexed as

breathing cyclehypoglossal nerve stimulationPAP failurePAP intolerancerespiratory sensingsleep apneaupper airway stimulation

Identifiers

PMID32337364
PMCPMC7178441

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.