Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32339929›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of medical informatics2020

Predicting Optimal Hypertension Treatment Pathways Using Recurrent Neural Networks.

Xiangyang Ye, Qing T Zeng, Julio C Facelli, Diana I Brixner, Mike Conway, Bruce E Bray

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of medical informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Towards Collaborative Fairness in Federated Learning Under Imbalanced Covariate Shift.KDD : proceedings. International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · 2025
    Article
  6. Personalized hypertension treatment recommendations by a data-driven model.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023
    Article
  7. Artificial Intelligence in Hypertension Management: An Ace up Your Sleeve.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiangyang YeDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Utah, 421 Wakara Way, Suite 140, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA. Electronic address: xiangyang.ye@utah.edu.
Qing T ZengDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Utah, 421 Wakara Way, Suite 140, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA; Department of Clinical Research and Leadership, The George Washington University, 2600 Virginia Ave., NW, First Floor, Washington DC, 20037, USA.
Julio C FacelliDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Utah, 421 Wakara Way, Suite 140, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
Diana I BrixnerDepartment of Pharmacotherapy, The University of Utah, 30 South 2000 East, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
Mike ConwayDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Utah, 421 Wakara Way, Suite 140, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
Bruce E BrayDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, The University of Utah, 421 Wakara Way, Suite 140, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
University of Utah · USGeorge Washington University · US

Funding

University of Utah Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR001067 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI DERE, WILLARD H., HESS, RACHEL · 2013 to 2017
$19.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn ambulatory care settings, physicians largely rely on clinical guidelines and guideline-based clinical decision support (CDS) systems to make decisions on hypertension treatment. However, current clinical evidence, which is the knowledge base of clinical guidelines, is insufficient to support definitive optimal treatment.

objectiveThe goal of this study is to test the feasibility of using deep learning predictive models to identify optimal hypertension treatment pathways for individual patients, based on empirical data available from an electronic health record database. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis study used data on 245,499 unique patients who were initially diagnosed with essential hypertension and received anti-hypertensive treatment from January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2010 in ambulatory care settings. We used recurrent neural networks (RNN), including long short-term memory (LSTM) and bi-directional LSTM, to create risk-adapted models to predict the probability of reaching the BP control targets associated with different BP treatment regimens. The ratios for the training set, the validation set, and the test set were 6:2:2. The samples for each set were independently randomly drawn from individual years with corresponding proportions.

resultsThe LSTM models achieved high accuracy when predicting individual probability of reaching BP goals on different treatments: for systolic BP (<140 mmHg), diastolic BP (<90 mmHg), and both systolic BP and diastolic BP (<140/90 mmHg), F1-scores were 0.928, 0.960, and 0.913, respectively.

conclusionsThe results demonstrated the potential of using predictive models to select optimal hypertension treatment pathways. Along with clinical guidelines and guideline-based CDS systems, the LSTM models could be used as a powerful decision-support tool to form risk-adapted, personalized strategies for hypertension treatment plans, especially for difficult-to-treat patients.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureBlood Pressure DeterminationDatabases, FactualElectronic Health RecordsFeasibility StudiesHumansHypertensionMonitoring, PhysiologicPatient Care PlanningPractice Guidelines as TopicAntihypertensive Agentsclinical decision supportdeep learninghypertension treatment pathwayslong short-term memoryrecurrent neural networks

Identifiers

PMID32339929
PMCPMC10490557
OpenAlexW3012850108

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.