Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32340221›Full record

ArticleCells2020

Exploring Biased Agonism at FPR1 as a Means to Encode Danger Sensing.

Jieny Gröper, Gabriele M König, Evi Kostenis, Volker Gerke, Carsten A Raabe, Ursula Rescher

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cells, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. TheFrontiers in immunology · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Annexin Animal Models-From Fundamental Principles to Translational Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jieny GröperInstitute of Medical Biochemistry, Center for Molecular Biology of Inflammation, University of Muenster, Von-Esmarch-Str. 56, D-48149 Muenster, Germany.
Gabriele M KönigInstitute for Pharmaceutical Biology, University of Bonn, Nussallee 6, 53115 Bonn, Germany.
Evi KostenisInstitute for Pharmaceutical Biology, University of Bonn, Nussallee 6, 53115 Bonn, Germany.
Volker GerkeInstitute of Medical Biochemistry, Center for Molecular Biology of Inflammation, University of Muenster, Von-Esmarch-Str. 56, D-48149 Muenster, Germany.
Carsten A RaabeInstitute of Medical Biochemistry, Center for Molecular Biology of Inflammation, University of Muenster, Von-Esmarch-Str. 56, D-48149 Muenster, Germany.
Ursula RescherInstitute of Medical Biochemistry, Center for Molecular Biology of Inflammation, University of Muenster, Von-Esmarch-Str. 56, D-48149 Muenster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8892-319X
Institute of Molecular Biology · DEUniversity of Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ligand-based selectivity in signal transduction (biased signaling) is an emerging field of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) research and might allow the development of drugs with targeted activation profiles. Human formyl peptide receptor 1 (FPR1) is a GPCR that detects potentially hazardous states characterized by the appearance of N-formylated peptides that originate from either bacteria or mitochondria during tissue destruction; however, the receptor also responds to several non-formylated agonists from various sources. We hypothesized that an additional layer of FPR signaling is encoded by biased agonism, thus allowing the discrimination of the source of threat. We resorted to the comparative analysis of FPR1 agonist-evoked responses across three prototypical GPCR signaling pathways, i.e., the inhibition of cAMP formation, receptor internalization, and ERK activation, and analyzed cellular responses elicited by several bacteria- and mitochondria-derived ligands. We also included the anti-inflammatory annexinA1 peptide Ac2-26 and two synthetic ligands, the W-peptide and the small molecule FPRA14. Compared to the endogenous agonists, the bacterial agonists displayed significantly higher potencies and efficacies. Selective pathway activation was not observed, as both groups were similarly biased towards the inhibition of cAMP formation. The general agonist bias in FPR1 signaling suggests a source-independent pathway selectivity for transmission of pro-inflammatory danger signaling.

Indexed as

Signal TransductionCyclic AMPEndocytosisFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferGTP-Binding ProteinsHeLa CellsHumansMitogen-Activated Protein KinasesPhosphorylationReceptors, Formyl PeptideCyclic AMPFPR1 protein, humanGTP-Binding ProteinsMitogen-Activated Protein KinasesReceptors, Formyl Peptideannexin A1 peptide Ac2-26bias analysisdanger-associated molecular pattern (DAMP)formyl peptide receptor 1G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP)

Identifiers

PMID32340221
PMCPMC7226602
OpenAlexW3018912498

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.