Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32340928›Full record

ArticleBiological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging2022

Association Between a Directly Translated Cognitive Measure of Negative Bias and Self-reported Psychiatric Symptoms.

Lucie Daniel-Watanabe, Martha McLaughlin, Siobhan Gormley, Oliver J Robinson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Optimism and pessimism: a concept for behavioural ecology.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Smartphones and the Neuroscience of Mental Health.Annual review of neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. The Importance of Common Currency Tasks in Translational Psychiatry.Current behavioral neuroscience reports · 2021
    Review
  11. Affective Bias Through the Lens of Signal Detection Theory.Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lucie Daniel-WatanabeInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Martha McLaughlinInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Siobhan GormleyInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom; MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Oliver J RobinsonInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: o.robinson@ucl.ac.uk.
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit · GBThe London College · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K024280/1Medical Research Council MR/R020817/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNegative interpretation biases are thought to be core symptoms of mood and anxiety disorders. However, prior work using cognitive tasks to measure such biases is largely restricted to case-control group studies, which cannot be used for inference about individuals without considerable additional validation. Moreover, very few measures are fully translational (i.e., can be used across animals and humans in treatment-development pipelines). This investigation aimed to produce the first measure of negative cognitive biases that is both translational and sensitive to individual differences, and then to determine which specific self-reported psychiatric symptoms are related to bias.

methodsA total of 1060 (n = 990 complete) participants performed a cognitive task of negative bias along with psychiatric symptom questionnaires. We tested the hypothesis that individual levels of mood and anxiety disorder symptomatology would covary positively with negative bias on the cognitive task using a combination of computational modeling of behavior, confirmatory factor analysis, exploratory factor analysis, and structural equation modeling.

resultsParticipants with higher depression symptoms (β = -0.16, p = .017) who were older (β = -0.11, p = .001) and had lower IQ (β = 0.14, p < .001) showed greater negative bias. Confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling suggested that no other psychiatric symptom (or transdiagnostic latent factor) covaried with task performance over and above the effect of depression, while exploratory factor analysis suggested combining depression/anxiety symptoms in a single latent factor. Generating groups using symptom cutoffs or latent mixture modeling recapitulated our prior case-control findings.

conclusionsThis measure, which uniquely spans both the clinical group-to-individual and preclinical animal-to-human generalizability gaps, can be used to measure individual differences in depression vulnerability for translational treatment-development pipelines.

Indexed as

AffectAnxiety DisordersAnimalsBiasCognitionHumansSelf ReportAnxietyComputational psychiatryDepressionIndividual differencesNegative affective biasOnline testingStructural equation modeling

Identifiers

PMID32340928
PMCPMC8816734
OpenAlexW3009616882

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.